Background:Volar locking plates have permitted early mobilization, omitting the need for prolonged cast immobilization, after distal radial fractures (DRFs). However, the type of rehabilitation following plate fixation of DRFs remains an unresolved issue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of physiotherapy after volar plate fixation of DRFs. At a 2-year follow-up, we compared the results of immediate physiotherapy (early mobilization) with those of home exercises following 2 weeks in a dorsal plaster splint (late mobilization).Methods:Patients with an extra-articular DRF scheduled for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a volar locking plate were evaluated for eligibility for enrollment in the study. The patients were randomized into 2 groups: (1) early mobilization and physiotherapy and (1) late mobilization and home exercise. In the early mobilization group, the plaster splint was removed after 2 to 3 days. During the first 3 months, the patients met with the institution’s physiotherapist every other week. The late mobilization group wore the dorsal splint for 2 weeks and only met with our physiotherapist once, when the splint was removed. This group was provided with a home physiotherapy program and instructed to perform home exercises on their own.Results:One hundred and nineteen patients were included in the study. The 2 groups had similar demographics with respect to age, sex, and baseline values. Seven patients were lost to follow-up. No clinically relevant difference in scores on the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire was found between the 2 groups at any of the follow-up evaluations. The largest difference in the QuickDASH score was found at 6 weeks, when the early mobilization group had a mean score of 30 compared with a mean of 37 in the late mobilization group (p = 0.05).Conclusions:Early mobilization and multiple physiotherapy visits did not improve wrist function compared with standard treatment of 2 weeks in a dorsal plaster splint, a single physiotherapy visit, and home exercises. Early mobilization following ORIF of an extra-articular DRF is safe.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: The aim of the study was to compare the functional outcomes following fixation with a volar locking plate (VLP) with those outcomes after augmented external fixation (EF) of displaced, intra-articular distal radial fractures in patients 18 to 70 years of age. Methods: Following inclusion, randomization, and surgery, clinical examination and outcome assessments were conducted at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. The primary outcome was the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and secondary outcomes included wrist range of motion, grip strength, and pain assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS). Results: Over a span of 3 years, 166 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 55.0 years (standard deviation [SD] = 11.5 years), with the ages distributed evenly in each treatment group by block randomization (84 patients in the VLP group and 82 in the EF group). The patients in the VLP group had a significantly better mean QuickDASH score, range of motion, and grip strength at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. There were no significant differences between the groups at 2 years. On the basis of the minimal clinically important difference, the difference in the QuickDASH score was clinically relevant only at 6 weeks and arguably at 3 months (9.2 and 8.5 points, respectively). Therefore, the statistically significant improvement in the functional outcome of VLP compared with that of EF cannot be safely said to have clinical relevance beyond 12 weeks. The overall complication rate was comparable between the 2 groups. The rate of follow-up at 2 years was 97.0%. Conclusions: VLP fixation resulted in faster recovery of function compared with EF, but no functional advantage was demonstrated at 2 years. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BackgroundSeveral studies published over the last decade indicate an increased incidence of distal radius fractures (DRF). With Norway having one of the highest reported incidence of DRFs, we conducted a study to assess the epidemiology of DRFs and its treatment in the catchment area of Akershus University Hospital (AHUS).MethodsPatients 16 years or older who presented to AHUS with an acute DRF during the years 2010 and 2011 were prospectively recorded and classified according to the AO fracture classification system. The mechanism of injury and treatment modality were noted.ResultsOverall, 1565 patients with an acute DRF presented to the institution in 2010–2011, of which 1134 (72%) were women. The overall annual incidence was 19.7 per 10,000 inhabitants 16 years or older. Women had an exponential increase in incidence after the age of 50, though the incidence for both genders peaked after the age of 80 years. There was an even distribution between extra- and intra-articular fractures. Falling while walking outside was the most common mechanism of injury. Of the 1565 registered, 418 (26.7%) patients underwent surgery, with a volar locking plate being the preferred surgical option in 77% of the cases.ConclusionThe overall incidence of distal radius fractures was lower in our study than earlier reports from Norway. Postmenopausal women had a higher risk of fracture than the other groups, and low-energy injuries were most dominant. 26.7% were treated operatively, which is higher than earlier reports, and might reflect an increasing preference for surgical treatment.