Background Patients with male-to-female gender dysphoria (GD) require multidisciplinary assessment and management. Nowadays, more and more patients decide to undergo genital reassignment surgery (GRS) to have aesthetic and functional external female genitalia. Different techniques of this procedure have been described. Orchiectomy, penile disassembly, creation of a neovaginal cavity, repositioning of urethral meatus, and clitorolabioplasty may be identified as the five major steps in all of these techniques. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent genital reassignment procedure for male-to-female GD at our department between November 2008 and August 2013 with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Data were collected on surgical technique, postoperative dilations protocol, complications, and functional and aesthetic outcomes. We describe and critically evaluate the surgical technique used in our department. Results Follow-up ranged from 14 to 46 months. Two patients developed late neovaginal stricture, and two patients experienced rectovaginal fistulae (one required surgical revision with dermal porcine graft placement). Minor complications occurred in 13 patients and included urethral stenosis, partial wound dehiscence, and minor bleeding. Secondary aesthetic revision surgery was performed in 13 cases. Conclusions GRS can provide good functional and aesthetic outcomes in patients with male-to-female GD. However, despite a careful planning and meticulous surgical technique, secondary procedures are frequently required to improve the function and appearance of the neovagina.

No abstract

Background: Minimally invasive procedures, such as thread suspension techniques, are a growing trend for facial rejuvenation. However, not enough data are available on the efficacy, outcomes, and morbidity of suture suspension techniques in mid-face reshaping.Aims: Our goal was to assess treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction following mid-face reshaping using threads with bidirectional convergent barbs (Definisse TM free floating threads).Patients/Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 60 patients who underwent treatment for mid-face reshaping using Definisse TM free floating threads.Response to treatment was assessed at 6 months using the mid-face-specific Mid-Face Volume Deficit scale (Allergan ® ), Global Aesthetic Improvement and FACE-QTM scales.Results: Sixty patients underwent mid-face treatment with the suspension thread technique (mean age 51.3, 90% female). No concomitant procedures were done. A reduction by one point or more in the Mid-Face Volume Deficit Scale (MDFVS) score treatment was seen in all patients after 6 months. Mean overall MFVDS and FACE-Q TM scores were significantly improved. On the GAIS, most patients were rated as improved or better both by the evaluating investigators and during self-assessment. No major complications were observed, and none of the patients requested the removal of the threads (mean follow-up 9.8 months, range 6-14 months). Conclusion:Our results suggest that mid-face reshaping with Definisse TM free floating threads is a safe and reliable procedure characterized by low complication rates and good esthetic results. This minimally invasive procedure is a good alternative for normal or combination skin patients who refuse or want to delay the need for traditional rhytidectomy.

4.

No abstract