No abstract

G-protein activation by different 5-HT receptor ligands was investigated in h5-HT1A receptor-transfected C6-glial and HeLa cells using agonist-stimulated [35S]-GTP gamma S binding to membranes in the presence of excess GDP. 5-HT (10 microM) stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding in the C6-glial membrane preparation to a larger extent than in the HeLa preparation; maximal responses with 30 microM GDP were 490 +/- 99 and 68 +/- 12%, respectively. With the 5-HT receptor agonists that were being investigated, the two preparations displayed the same rank order of potency for stimulation of [35S]GTP gamma S binding. In the C6-glial preparation at 0.3 microM GDP, the rank order of maximal effects was: 5-HT (1.00) > 8-OH-DPAT (0.90) = R(+)-8-OH-DPAT (0.87) = 5-CT (0.86) = L694247 (0.84) > S(-)8-OH-DPAT (0.68) = buspirone (0.67) = spiroxatrine (0.67) = flesinoxan (0.64) > ipsapirone (0.53) = (-)-pindolol (0.50) > SDZ216525 (0.25). However, differences in maximal response in the C6-glial preparation were magnified by increasing the GDP concentrations, indicating that the activity state of G-proteins can affect the maximal response. With the exception of 5-CT and L694247, increasing the amount of GDP to 30 microM and higher concentrations resulted in an attenuation of both the ligand's maximal effect (24 to 56%) and apparent potency (6 to 24-fold). Each of the [35S]GTP gamma S binding responses was mediated by a 5-HT1A receptor as indicated by the competitive blockade by WAY100635 and spiperone. Only 5-CT and L694247 in some conditions displayed an efficacy similar to that of 5-HT at the h5-HT1A receptor; the other agents with intrinsic activity are partial agonists at this receptor. The data also suggest that the activity state of the G-proteins is involved in the maximal effects that can be produced by activating the h5-HT1A receptor.

No abstract

The Hedgehog (HH) pathway has been linked to the formation of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), medulloblastoma, and other cancers. The recently approved orally active drugs vismodegib (GDC‐0449) and sonidegib (LDE–225) were not only efficacious for the treatment of advanced or metastatic BCC by antagonizing the smoothened (SMO) receptor, but also produced important side effects, limiting their use for less invasive BCC. Herein, we compared a large series of SMO antagonists, including GDC‐0449 and LDE‐225, the clinically tested BMS‐833923, CUR‐61414, cyclopamine, IPI‐926 (saridegib), itraconazole, LEQ‐506, LY‐2940680 (taladegib), PF‐04449913 (glasdegib), and TAK‐441 as well as preclinical candidates (PF‐5274857, MRT‐83) in two SMO‐dependent cellular assays and for G‐protein activation. We report marked differences in inhibitor potencies between compounds as well as a notable disparity between the G‐protein assay and the cellular tests, suggesting that classification of drugs is assay dependent. Furthermore, we explored topical efficacies of SMO antagonists on depilated mice using Gli1 and Ptch1 mRNA quantification in skin as biomarkers of the HH signaling inhibition. This topical model rapidly discriminated drugs in terms of efficacies and potencies for inhibition of both biomarkers. SMO antagonists showed also a large variation in their blood and skin partition, suggesting that some drugs are more favorable for topical application. Overall, our data suggested that in vitro and in vivo efficacious drugs such as LEQ‐506 and TAK‐441 may be of interest for topical treatment of less invasive BCC with minimal side effects.

No abstract