Acute appendicitis is one of the commonest surgical emergency. A case of appendicitis can progress to perforation and other life threatening complications, which is associated with much higher morbidity and mortality and the surgeons are left with no option than to operate, when diagnosed clinically rather than to wait until it is confirm. Despite the introduction of various scoring system, extraordinary advances in modern radiographic imaging and diagnostic laboratory investigation, the accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis remains an enigmatic challenge. A scoring system for early diagnosis of acute appendicitis was developed by Alvarado in 1986; based on clinical signs, symptoms and differential leucocyte count, with a left shift of neutrophil maturation yielding a total score of 10; known as Alvarado score. Kalan et al omitted the left shift to neutrophil maturation parameter and produced a Modified Alvarado score. It is a 9 point scoring system that helps in increasing the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis and thus reducing negative appendicectomy rate. Score of 7 or more were recommened for surgery.Various radiological imagings like plain X-ray, barium meal follow through, barium enema, graded compression ultrasonography, colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT scan, MRI has been developed for more accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis; but no one is confirmatory. It has been claimed that ultrasonography dramatically reduce the number of appendicectomy in patients without appendicitis. It is especially useful in children and young thin adults; and in females it will allow exclusion of gynaecological cause with diagnostic accuracy in excess of 90%.The aim of this study to validate the user friendly pre-operative diagnostic method based on prospectively collected data from patients admitted for suspected appendicitis incorporating the Modified Alvarado Score and graded compression ultrasonography.
I. Research Design And MethodsStudy population: Patients of all age group varrying between 7 -65 yrs of age,both male and female,presented in casualty department,OPD&indoor with the clinical features suggestive of acute appendicitis were selected non randomly for the study. Sample size and sample technique:55 patients selected non randomly. Data collection technique and tools: Data was collected as Alvarado score,ultrasonographic finding and histopathologicalreports.alvarado score of >7 were taken as positive and <7 as negative.histopathology showing inflamed appendix were taken as positive an normal appendix as negative.sonographically showing features suggestive of appendicitis in patients with Alvarado score <7 were marked positive. Data analysis:Categorizations of different parameters were performed by simple statistical methods like standard table, Pie diagrams, And Bar charts etc. Statistical analysis was performed using
Introduction: Inferior Lumbar hernia is a rare abdominal hernia and clinical suspicion is necessary for diagnosis. Case presentation: We report the case of a 35-year-old lady with a reducible inferior lumbar hernia. The hernia was repaired with prolene mesh. The patient was free of recurrence at 6 months after the operation. Conclusion: A lumbar or flank mass should always raise suspicion of a lumbar hernia. Adequate surgical treatment should be planned on the basis of etiology and hernia size. Both open and laparoscopic techniques can be used with good results
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.