No abstract

This research examines the influence of level of education and health rate as the measurement of human capital to productivity in East Java Provice, during 2009 to 2015. Variable of level of education is measured by literacy rate, while the variable of health rate is measured by infant mortality rate. The panel data analysis is used as research method, which is Fixed Effect Model is the best model than the other models. The research results show that the variable of level of education is not significant to productivity, whreas, the variable healt rate has negative and significant influence to productivity. The reason is because educated worker is not really nedded in East Java Province. Some workers with skills and experiences are preferred. Therefore, in this research literacy rate cannot be used as good proxy to measured variable of level of education. Moreover, a decrease in infant mortality rate is indicating that the health rate is good. Hence, productivity

This study aims to determine the level of inequality in education as measured by the Gini Education Coefficient (KGP) in Indonesia, to compare the level of inequality between provinces and to analyze the factors that influence educational inequality between provinces in Indonesia. This research was conducted in a number of Indonesian provinces in 2017-2019 using a panel data anayisis methods. The results showed that education inequality in Indonesia in 2017-2019 was in the low inequality category. The number of Gini coefficients is getting smaller each year, which indicates a more even distribution of education in Indonesia. When viewed from the regional classification, Eastern Indonesia has a higher KGP score than the Western part of Indonesia. The education budget has a negative and significant effect on education inequality in Indonesia in 2017-209 while the number of teachers and school principals has a significant positive effect on education inequality in Indonesia in 2017-2019.

Makalah ini menguji hubungan antara globalisasi ekonomi dan tingkat ketimpangan wilayah di negara-negara anggota ASEAN, menggunakan data panel dari tahun 2000 sampai 2012. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan pengaruh positif dan signifikan secara statistik antara globalisasi ekonomi terhadap tingkat kesenjangan di negara anggota ASEAN. Negara dengan tingkat integrasi ekonomi lebih besar dengan negara ASEAN cenderung tercatat dengan tingkat ketimpangan wilayah yang lebih tinggi. Temuan ini juga memasukkan variabel penjelas lain yang hubungan yang relevan terhadap ketimpangan spasial yang terjadi di negara ASEAN. Analisis ini juga mengungkapkan secara spasial dampak globalisasi ekonomi terhadap negara dengan populasi penduduk yang lebih besar yang menunjukkan tingkat disparitas wilayah negara-negara ASEAN.

No abstract