No abstract

No abstract

Lee et al. Reply:The authors of the Comment claim to have found significant differences between the calculations by Lee et al. l and those by Price and co-workers 2 and Pannert, Ring, and Boguta. 3 The values of the quadrupole moment Q20 that they use for their comparison are not those published in the Erratum. 4 If these corrected values are inserted, all calculations agree within 10% and the systematics in the results are the same.Secondly, the authors of the Comment attack parameter set LI as unphysical. However, it was clearly stated in Ref. 1 that this is not a good parameter set. It was only used for exploratory studies.The third point concerns 12 C. It is shown by Fink et al. 5 that parameter set NL2 also produces an oblate 12 C.