Religion and spirituality have the ability to promote or damage mental health. This potential demands an increased awareness of religious matters by practitioners in the mental health field as well as ongoing attention in psychiatric research.

No abstract

No abstract

Dementia is a complicated disease requiring medical, psychological, and social services. Services to address these needs include medical care (outpatient physician/specialist, inpatient, emergency) and community care (home health, day care, meal preparation, transportation, counseling, support groups, respite care, physical therapy). This systematic review of articles published in English from 1991 to the present examines studies of ambulatory, community-dwelling dementia patients with established dementia diagnoses. Searches of the Medline database using 13 combinations of search terms, plus searches of Embase and PsycINFO databases using 3 combinations of terms and examination of reference lists of related articles, resulted in identification of 15 studies dealing with healthcare utilization among community-dwelling dementia patients in both medical and community care settings. Patients with dementia frequently use the full spectrum of medical services. Community resources are used less frequently. Community healthcare services may be a valuable resource in alleviating some burden of dementia care for physicians.

Background Understanding of cancer outcomes is limited by data fragmentation. We analyzed the information yielded by integrating breast cancer data from three sources: electronic medical records (EMRs) of two healthcare systems and the state registry. Methods We extracted diagnostic test and treatment data from EMRs of all breast cancer patients treated from 2000–2010 in two independent California institutions: a community-based practice (Palo Alto Medical Foundation) and an academic medical center (Stanford University). We incorporated records from the population-based California Cancer Registry (CCR), and then linked EMR-CCR datasets of Community and University patients. Results We initially identified 8210 University patients and 5770 Community patients; linked datasets revealed a 16% patient overlap, yielding 12,109 unique patients. The proportion of all Community patients, but not University patients, treated at both institutions increased with worsening cancer prognostic factors. Before linking datasets, Community patients appeared to receive less intervention than University patients (mastectomy: 37.6% versus 43.2%; chemotherapy: 35% versus 41.7%; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): 10% versus 29.3%; genetic testing: 2.5% versus 9.2%). Linked Community and University datasets revealed that patients treated at both institutions received substantially more intervention (mastectomy: 55.8%; chemotherapy: 47.2%; MRI: 38.9%; genetic testing: 10.9%; p<0.001 for each three-way institutional comparison). Conclusion Data linkage identified 16% of patients who were treated in two healthcare systems and who, despite comparable prognostic factors, received far more intensive treatment than others. By integrating complementary data from EMRs and population-based registries, we obtained a more comprehensive understanding of breast cancer care and factors that drive treatment utilization.