Greater partner support is linked to higher OT for both men and women; however, the importance of OT and its potentially cardioprotective effects on sympathetic activity and BP may be greater for women.

No abstract

Objective In this conceptual review, we propose a novel mechanistic candidate in the etiology of depression with onset in the menopause transition (a.k.a. perimenopausal depression) involving alterations in stress-responsive pathways, induced by ovarian hormone fluctuation. Methods The relevant literature in perimenopausal depression was reviewed, including its prevalence, predictors, and treatment with estrogen therapy. Subsequently, the growing evidence from animal models and clinical research in other reproductive mood disorders was synthesized to describe a heuristic model of perimenopausal depression development. Results The rate of major depressive disorder and of clinically meaningful elevations in depressive symptoms increases two- to threefold during the menopause transition. While the mechanisms by which ovarian hormone fluctuation might impact mood are poorly understood, growing evidence from basic and clinical research suggests that fluctuations in ovarian hormones and their derived neurosteroids result in altered GABAergic regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Our heuristic model suggests that for some women, failure of the GABAA receptor to regulate overall GABAergic tone in the face of shifting levels of these neurosteroids may induce HPA axis dysfunction, thereby increasing sensitivity to stress, and generating a period of greater vulnerability to depression. Conclusions The proposed model provides a basis for understanding the mechanisms by which the changing hormonal environment of the menopause transition may interact with the psychosocial environment of mid-life to contribute to perimenopausal depression risk. Future research investigating this model may inform the development of novel pharmacological treatments for perimenopausal depression and related disorders such as postpartum depression and premenstrual dysphoric disorder.

This study examined gender differences in smoking-related analgesia and stress-induced analgesia (SIA), as a function of pain modality. Forty men (20 smokers, 20 nonsmokers) and 37 women (17 smokers) were tested twice for pain sensitivity to tourniquet ischemia, thermal heat, and cold pressor tests; once following mental stress and once following rest control, counterbalancing order. Cardiovascular and neuroendocrine responses to mental stress were also examined. While expected gender differences in pain sensitivity were observed, women smokers had greater threshold and tolerance times to ischemic pain than women nonsmokers (P<0.05) when pain testing followed rest. Male smokers had greater threshold and tolerance to cold pressor pain than male nonsmokers (P<0.05) after both rest and stress. Only women showed evidence for SIA, since women nonsmokers demonstrated greater ischemic pain threshold and tolerance following mental stress versus rest (P<0.05), and all women reported lower thermal heat pain unpleasantness after stress versus rest (P=0.05). Only nonsmokers showed expected inverse relationships between sympathetic and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis reactivity measures and sensitivity to pain. Smokers showed evidence for blunted HPA-axis function at rest and stress. These results indicate that analgesia related to both being a smoker and stress is influenced by gender and pain modality. The reduced pain perception in smokers and absence of relationships between endogenous pain regulatory mechanisms and pain sensitivity may reflect a maladaptive response to chronic smoking.