Purpose: To retrospectively report the outcomes of patients presenting to our facility with central retinal artery occlusion and receiving therapy with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO).Methods: This was a retrospective, chart review at a single hospital center. Patients with diagnosed central retinal artery occlusion were treated with HBO twice daily for 5 days during their inpatient stay for a total of 10 HBO treatments. Main outcome was change from the documented presenting best-corrected visual acuity to discharge best-corrected visual acuity. Thirty-nine patients with central retinal artery occlusion were included in the analysis during a 30-month period.Results: Twenty-eight of 39 patients (72%) had some improvement in acuity. There was a mean of 5.05 lines of improvement using a modified Snellen chart after completing their HBO treatment course. Patients treated within 12 hours of symptom onset showed the greatest improvement in their visual acuity (6.11 mean lines of improvement). Complications of therapy included middle ear barotrauma (10/39) and confinement anxiety (1/39) and did not interfere with the therapy regimen or hospital course.Conclusion: This retrospective case series supports the use of emergent HBO therapy as a viable treatment option for patients with central retinal artery occlusion. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy was safely administered and well tolerated.
Frostbite injury causes direct damage to tissues following exposure to temperatures below their freezing point causing tissue death potentially leading to serious amputations. After rewarming, a variety of treatment options have been employed to avoid amputation. This case report details the use of indocyanine green fluorescence microangiography to monitor the clinical progression of perfusion following hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for severe frostbite injury. We present a case report of a man with deep frostbite of the bilateral hands treated with thrombolytics and HBOT. After rewarming, the patient received thrombolytics shortly after arrival and then went on to be treated with HBOT on hospital day 5. Patient's healing progress was monitored using serial microangiography. Microangiography evaluation was performed on day 6 and then weekly to track treatment progress. A more uniform brightness appears in his left hand by completion of his therapies, consistent with normal perfusion. The dark ischemic areas in the right hand receded in digits 1 to 3 and appeared normalized in the fourth digit. The patient received a total of 20 HBO treatments. After completion of therapy, the patient went on to have a partial amputation of his first, second, and third fingers on his right hand. Our case report demonstrates serial microangiography to monitor a frostbite patient's progress during HBOT and provided additional information allowing us to plan duration of treatments. Our case report describes the role that microangiography may serve in monitoring patient progress following severe frostbite injury.
Introduction The treatment of severe frostbite injury has been undergoing evolution and experimentation. In the last 30 years, there has been a rapid expansion in the understanding and available treatments for frostbite. There is no consensus on the best methods for diagnosis or treatment worldwide. At our institution, we have designed a treatment algorithm and this study assesses the efficacy of our treatment algorithm. Methods All patients with severe frostbite injury were included in our prospective observational trial on the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. We developed a standard algorithm which includes diagnosis, medical treatment, wound care, therapy, and surgery for frostbitten patients. Results 80.7% of frostbitten tissue with no blood flow present at the time of admission became viable and did not require amputation or debridement for patients on our protocol. Our centers time to delivery of thrombolytics has reduced significantly over the course of this study to an average of just under 6 hours. Conclusions This protocol for severe frostbite injury results in significant tissue salvage at 80.7%. Having a standardized protocol allows for expediting frostbite patients care that results in dramatically improved outcomes
Assessment of frostbite injury typically relies on computed tomography, angiography, or nuclear medicine studies to detect perfusion deficits prior to thrombolytic therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of a novel imaging method, microangiography, in the assessment of severe frostbite injury. Patients with severe frostbite were included if they received a post-thrombolytic Technetium 99 (Tc99) bone scan, a Tc99 bone scan without thrombolytic therapy, and/or post-thrombolytic microangiography (MA) study. We included all patients from the years 2006 to 2018 with severe frostbite injury who had received appropriate imaging for diagnosis: Tc99 scan alone (N = 82), microangiography alone (N = 22), and both Tc99 and microangiography (N = 26). The majority of patients received thrombolytic therapy (76.2%), and the average time to thrombolytics was 6.9 hours. Tc99 scans showed strong correlation with amputation level (r = .836, P < .001), and microangiography showed a slightly stronger positive correlation with amputation level (r = .870, P < .001). In the subset who received both Tc99 scan and microangiography (N = 26), we observed significant differences in the mean scores of perfusion deficit (z = 3.20, P < .001). In this subset, a moderate correlation was found between level of perfusion deficit on Tc99 bone scan and amputation level (r = .525, P = .006). A very strong positive correlation was found between the microangiography studies and the amputation level (r = .890, P < .001). These results demonstrate that microangiography is a reliable alternative method of assessing severe frostbite injury and predicting amputation level.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.