The objectives of this study were to optimize the formula of the self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) containing rosuvastatin and to evaluate its physicochemical characteristics. The solubility and compatibility of rosuvastatin in surfactants, cosurfactants, and oil excipients were evaluated. The D-optimal experimental design, created by JMP 15 software, was used for analyzing the effects of excipients on the physicochemical characteristics of SNEDDS to optimize the rosuvastatin SNEDDS formula. The generated nanoemulsions from Ros SNEDDS were characterized for droplet size, polydispersity index, and entrapment efficiency. As a result, Cremophor RH40, Capryol 90, and PEG 400 were selected to develop the pseudoternary phase diagram to identify the area capable of selfforming nanoemulsion. As the percentage of rosuvastatin calcium increased from 8% to 12%, the area for optimizing the formula of Ros SNEDDS decreased. The Ros SNEDDS prepared according to predicted formulas possessed selfemulsification to form nanoemulsion with average droplet size less than 100 nm, polydispersity index less than 0.3, and rosuvastatin entrapment higher than 90%.

No abstract

No abstract

This study develops the in-house specifications of self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) containing rosuvastatin based on the following criteria: description, identification, droplet size (≤200 nm) and polydiversity index (not more than 0.3), drug proportion in the oil phase (≥ 90.0%), assay (≥ 95.0% and ≤105.0% of the labeled amount of rosuvastatin (C22H28FN3O6S). The criteria were validated and the results were suitable for identification and determination of rosuvastatin in SNEDDS. Additionally, the results of the stability study show that the rosuvastatin SNEDDS met the criteria of description, droplet size, PDI, assay and drug rate in the oil phase for 12-month storage under the long-term condition (12 months) and 6 months on accelerated condition. Keywords Rosuvastatin, SNEDDS, specification, droplet size, entrapment efficiency. References [1] A. Luvai, W. Mbagaya, A.S. Hall, I.H. Barth, Rosuvastatin: A Review of the Pharmacology and Clinical Effectiveness in Cardiovascular Disease, Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology 6 (2012) 17–33. https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S4324. [2] K. Balakumar, C.V. Raghavan, N.T. Selvan, R.H. Prasad, S. Abdu, Self nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) of Rosuvastatin calcium: Design, formulation, bioavailability and pharmacokinetic evaluation, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 112 (2013) 337–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.08.025. [3] S. Elkadi, S. Elsamaligy, S. Al-Suwayeh, H. Mahmoud, The Development of Self-nanoemulsifying Liquisolid Tablets to Improve the Dissolution of Simvastatin, American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 18(7) (2017) 2586–2597. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-017-0743-z. [4] D. Patel, K.K. Sawant, Self Micro-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System: Formulation Development and Biopharmaceutical Evaluation of Lipophilic Drugs, Current Drug Delivery 6 (2009) 419–424. https://doi.org/10.2174/156720109789000519. [5] S.D. Maurya, R.K.K. Arya, G Rajpal, R.C. Dhakar, Self-micro emulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS): A review on physico-chemical and biopharmaceutical aspects, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 7(3) (2017) 55–65. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v7i3.1453.[6] P. Borman, D. Elder, Q2(R1) Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology, in: A. Teasdale, D. Elder, R.W. Nims (Eds), ICH quality guidelines: an implementation guide, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, 2018, pp. 127-166. [7] United States Pharmacopoeia 41, rosuvastatin tablets monograph.        

No abstract