The aim here was to evaluate the evidence that might support or refute the use of intra-articular viscosupplementation in treating patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthrosis. A review of the literature was conducted using the Medline, PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Trial Register databases and Cochrane database systematic reviews (Cochrane Library). Only studies presenting a high level of evidence were taken into consideration. This study included analysis on randomized clinical trials that included at least 100 patients in each intervention group, meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Two meta-analyses, five systematic reviews and six randomized clinical trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this review. In the light of the best evidence available so far, there is no consensus for indicating or even for contraindicating the use of intra-articular viscosupplementation among patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthrosis (level of evidence I and degree of recommendation A). Further studies with appropriate methodology are needed to elucidate this matter.

No abstract

Objectives: The topography of the high cervical spine involves several traumatic, degenerative, and rheumatologic pathologies. With the evolution of surgical techniques and synthesis materials available for use in such region, an optimization of the anatomical understanding of this area is required. Methods: Therefore, this study evaluated 62 computed tomographies of the high cervical spine in an adult population, aiming at the study of the anatomical parameters of the axis pedicle. The measures analyzed in this observational study were pedicle length at axial section, pedicle length at sagittal section, pedicle thickness at axial section and interpedicular angulation. Results: Computed tomography is a necessary exam for the programming of C2 pedicle screws and is useful for determining the anatomical changes and evaluating the length of the screws that will be used. Furthermore, no statistically significant difference was observed in the length, angulation, and diameter of the pedicles of the axis in relation to sex or age. Conclusion: Regarding sex and age, no statistically significant difference on length, angulation, and pedicle diameter occur. There is an urgent need for computed tomography for surgical planning. Level of Evidence II; Transversal Diagnostic Studies – Investigation of a Diagnosis Test.