Objective To determine how Japanese patients with lung cancer weigh potential survival, chemotherapy response rate, and symptom relief against the potential toxicity of different treatments in cancer chemotherapy.
Methods and PatientsWe used a questionnaire describing a hypothetical situation about stage IV nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Seventy-three patients with lung cancer who had received chemotherapy and 120 patients with other respiratory disease as the control group were asked to rate the minimal benefit that would make two hypothetical treatments acceptable. For "chance of cure," "response but not cure," and "symptom relief," the subjects could give answers from 1% to 100% and for prolonging life could give answers from 1 to 60 months.Results Patients with lung cancer were significantly more likely than were patients with other respiratory diseases to accept either intensive or less-intensive treatments for a potentially small benefit for "chance of cure," "response but not cure," and "symptom relief". The degree of survival advantage that patients require before accepting cancer treatment with its associated toxicity varied widely. If their lives were prolonged 3 months, 19% and 21% of patients with lung cancer would choose to receive intensive and less-intensive treatment, respectively. When the chance of symptom relief was 70%, 73% of patients with lung cancer were willing to choose intensive chemotherapy. Factor associated with patients' choice of chemotherapy in both groups was age.Conclusion Oncologists must consider the substantial range of attitudes to chemotherapy among patients when making treatment decisions and they must give patients the opportunity to be included in this process. (Internal Medicine 44: 107-113, 2005)
Physicians must consider the substantial range of attitudes to chemoradiotherapy among patients when selecting treatment and give patients opportunities to be included in the treatment-selection process.
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of the number of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) with the effectiveness of cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We prospectively evaluated CTCs in the peripheral blood of patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC. From May 2008 through August 2010, 33 patients (23 men and 10 women; median age, 64 years; range, 46-74 years) were enrolled. All patients received combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin. The CTCs were captured from samples of peripheral blood with a semiautomated system using an antibody against epithelial cell adhesion molecule. Blood samples with one or more CTC per 7.5 ml were defined as positive. Of total 33 patients, 12 (36.4%) had positive CTCs and 5 (15.2%) had five or more CTCs before chemotherapy. There were no differences in response rates to cytotoxic chemotherapy between CTC-positive patients and CTC-negative patients. On the other hand, the rate of progressive disease in cytotoxic chemotherapy was significantly higher in CTC-positive patients (66.7%) than in CTC-negative patients (23.8%, p = 0.02). In conclusion, the number of CTCs could be a useful predictive factor for the effectiveness of cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.