No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Chewing areca quid (AQ) has been implicated as a major risk factor for the development of oral squamous-cell carcinoma (OSCC). Recent studies have suggested that AQ-generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) is one of the contributing factors for oral carcinogenesis. However, the AQ used in Taiwan is different from that used in other countries. This study is designed to test whether ROS are generated and the consequent effects in locally prepared AQ in vivo. We measured the hydroxyl radical formation, as represented by the presence of o- and m-tyrosine in saliva from volunteers who chewed AQ containing 20 mg phenylalanine. Their saliva contained significantly higher amounts (p < .05) of o- and m-tyrosine as compared to the controls. In addition, chewing AQ containing Piper betle inflorescence generated higher amounts of m-tyrosine, but not o-tyrosine, in saliva than did chewing AQ containing betel leaf. We further tested the oxidative DNA damaging effect of the reconstituted AQ, as evidenced by the elevation of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) levels, in hamster buccal pouch. Following daily painting for 14 d, the 8-OH-dG level in hamster buccal pouch is significantly elevated (p < .05) in the AQ-treated group versus the controls. These findings demonstrate that ROS, such as hydroxyl radical, are formed in the human oral cavity during AQ chewing, and chewing such prepared AQ might cause oxidative DNA damage to the surrounding tissues.

Because of a decrease in central brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and the important role of BDNF in neuronal survival, BDNF may represent a candidate gene conferring susceptibility to AD. Recently, a functional BDNF Val66Met polymorphism has been associated with AD in an Italian population. In the present study, we investigated a possible role of this BDNF polymorphism in the susceptibility of AD or AD onset in a Chinese population. Comparing AD patients and controls, the distribution of the BDNF genotypes and alleles did not differ significantly. The onset age was not significantly different comparing the three BDNF genotype groups. Our negative findings suggest that it is unlikely that the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism plays a major role in the pathogenesis of AD in the Chinese population and do not support previous findings that homozygosity for the 66Val allele confers an increased risk for AD. Further studies with genetic variations in BDNF relating either to AD-associated depression or to the AD treatment response are suggested.