The Electronic judiciary is a policy issued by e-court launching. This was to address global challenges as well as to realize the acceleration of case management. During the pandemic, litigation becomes hampered because it has to reduce physical contact in implementing health protocols. Therefore, the problems of case management that were previously done offline should begin to be diverted by optimizing the function of the e-court. Thus, the implementation of technology information is very important to ensure the court running process. The development of electronic judiciary is carried out by comparing with several countries to become evaluation and reference material. The goal is to make the electronic judiciary more accessible and easier to use by the public. The method used is a qualitative approach with policy conceptual comparison. The result is that the e-court must be able to facilitate up to the administrative process, the trial, until the verdict.

Apart from being committed with civilian cases, cases of decency crime are also encountered with military status, even being processed in military courts. The scope of decency in this study is participating in adultery as formulated in Article 284 of the Criminal Code. The threat of criminal sanctions for decency is not only imprisonment, but additional punishment of dismissal from military service. Military judges in imposing additional sentences of dismissal must be based on reasons for considering whether or not they are eligible to serve in the military environment. There is a disparity problem among military judges in interpreting the inappropriate meaning of a TNI Soldier so that it impacts the image in society.