Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) have inferior survival when compared to children. The causes are multiple and include bad biology, differences in treatment approaches, and other complex social, economic and psychological factors that affect therapy adherence. 1 Intensive 'paediatric' regimens improve outcomes, but these come with the cost of higher toxicity, which may even negate these benefit of reduced relapse. 2-5 To understand the real-world data from India, we analysed the outcomes of AYA ALL (aged 15-29 years, treated between 2012 and 2017) from a retrospective database maintained by the Hematology Cancer Consortium (HCC). Baseline data of all patients (including those who were not treated) diagnosed within the period stipulated by a particular centre were captured, including reasons for not availing treatment. Survival outcomes were estimated for treated patients (censored on 31 July 2019). For this analysis, 'high risk' was defined based on white blood cell count (WBC) at diagnosis (B cell >30 9 10 9 /l, T cell >100 9 10 9 /l). Protocols such as Multicentre protocol 841 (MCP-841), Berlin-Frankfurt-M€ unster 95 (BFM-95), BFM-90, and Children's Oncology Group (COG) were considered 'paediatric type', whereas German Multicentre ALL (GMALL), hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (Hyper-CVAD), and UKALL were considered 'adult type'. Minimal residual disease (MRD) >0Á01% (when assessed by flow cytometry) was considered positive. Of the 1383 patients registered, 1141(82Á5%) underwent treatment (Supplementary Table S1 and S2, baseline characteristics), and 242 did not start treatment (Fig 1). The inability to afford treatment was the commonest cause for not initiating treatment (105/1383, 7Á6%). There were no Fig 1. Flowchart depicting the outcomes of patients who were included in the registry. Of the 1383 patients, only 1141 started therapy (induction) and 863 (76%) achieved complete remission (CR). At last follow-up, 574 were in CR and on follow-up. A total of 336/1383 (24%) patients either did not start therapy (N = 242), or abandoned therapy after starting induction (N = 94) (A). (B) Comparison of induction outcomes between those treated with 'paediatric' and 'adult' protocols. There were no differences in terms of achievement of CR (76% vs. 73%, P = 0Á509), induction mortality (4Á7% vs. 3Á2%, P = 0Á842), or minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity rate (36% vs. 42%, P = 0Á382). (C) The commonest cause of induction mortality was infection (56%) followed by progressive disease (23%).

BackgroundComputed tomography (CT) scans and CT severity scores (CTSS) are widely used to assess the severity and prognosis in coronavirus disease 2019 . CTSS has performed well as a predictor in differentiating severe from non-severe cases. However, it is not known if CTSS performs similarly in hospitalized severe cases with hypoxia at admission. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective comparative study at a COVID-care center from Western India between 25th April and 31st May 2021, enrolling all consecutive severe COVID-19 patients with hypoxemia (peripheral oxygen saturation < 94%). Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), D-dimer, ferritin, and CT thorax were done within 24h of admission before being initiated on any anti-COVID-19 therapy. CTSS was calculated by visual assessment and categorized into three severity categories and was correlated with laboratory markers and overall survival (OS). Statistical analysis was done using John's Macintosh Project (JMP) 15.0.0 ver. 3.0.0 (Cary, North Carolina). ResultsThe median age of the study population (n-298) was 59 years (24-95) with a male preponderance (61.41%, n=183). The 15 and 30-day survivals were 67.64% and 59.90%, respectively. CTSS did not correlate with age, gender, time from vaccination, symptoms, or comorbidities but had a significant though weak correlation with LDH (p=0.009), D-dimer (p=0.006), and NLR (p=0.019). Comparing demographic and laboratory aspects using CT severity categories, only NLR (p=0.0146) and D-dimer (p=0.0006) had significant differences. The 15d-OS of mild, moderate, and severe CT categories were 88.62%, 70.39%, and 52.62%, respectively, while 30d-OS of three categories were 59.08%, 63.96%, and 49.12%, respectively. ConclusionAmong hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients with hypoxemia at admission, CT severity categories correlate well with outcomes but not inflammatory markers at admission.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract