This is a PDF file of a peer-reviewed paper that has been accepted for publication. Although unedited, the content has been subjected to preliminary formatting. Nature is providing this early version of the typeset paper as a service to our authors and readers. The text and figures will undergo copyediting and a proof review before the paper is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

The sudden global emergence of SARS-CoV-2 urgently requires an in-depth understanding of molecular functions of viral proteins and their interactions with the host proteome. Several omics studies have extended our knowledge of COVID-19 pathophysiology, including some focused on proteomic aspects 1-3 . To understand how SARS-CoV-2 and related coronaviruses manipulate the host we here characterized interactome, proteome and signaling processes in a systems-wide manner. This identified connections between the corresponding cellular events, revealed functional effects of the individual viral proteins and put these findings into the context of host signaling pathways. We investigated the closely related SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV viruses as well as the influence of SARS-CoV-2 on transcriptome, proteome, ubiquitinome and phosphoproteome of a lung-derived human cell line. Projecting these data onto the global network of cellular interactions revealed relationships between the perturbations taking place upon SARS-CoV-2 infection at different layers and identified unique and common molecular mechanisms of SARS coronaviruses. The results highlight the functionality of individual proteins as well as vulnerability hotspots of SARS-CoV-2, which we targeted with clinically approved drugs. We exemplify this by identification of kinase inhibitors as well as MMPase inhibitors with significant antiviral effects against SARS-CoV-2. Main text:To identify interactions of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV with cellular proteins, we transduced A549 lung carcinoma cells with lentiviruses expressing individual HA-tagged viral proteins (Figure 1a;Extended data Fig. 1a; Supplementary Table 1). Affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry analysis (AP-MS) and statistical modelling of the MS1-level quantitative data allowed identification of 1484 interactions between 1086 cellular proteins and 24 SARS-CoV-2 and 27 SARS-CoV bait proteins (Figure 1b; Extended data Fig. 1b; Supplementary Table 2). The resulting virus-host interaction network revealed a wide range of cellular activities intercepted by SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV (Figure 1b; Extended data Table 1; Supplementary Table 2). In particular, we discovered Extended data Figure 1 | Expression of viral proteins in transduced A549 cells induces changes to the host proteome. (a) Expression of HA-tagged viral proteins, in stably transduced A549 cells, used in AP-MS and proteome expression measurements. (b) The extended version of the virus-host protein-protein interaction network with 24 SARS-CoV-2 and 27 SARS-CoV proteins, as well as ORF3 of HCoV-NL63 and ORF4 and 4a of HCoV-229E, used as baits. Host targets regulated upon viral protein overexpression or SARS-CoV-2 infection (based on the analysis of all data of this study) are highlighted (see the in-plot legend). (c-f) Co-precipitation experiments in HEK 293T cells showing a specific enrichment of (c) endogenous MAVS co-precipitated with c-term HA-tagged ORF7b of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV (negative controls: SARS-CoV-2 ORF6-HA, ORF7a-HA), (d) ORF7b-H...

No abstract

The rapid activation of pattern recognition receptor (PRR)-mediated type I interferon (IFN) signaling is crucial for the host response to infection. In turn, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) must evade this potent response to establish life-long infection. Here, we reveal that the HCMV tegument protein UL35 antagonizes the activation of type I IFN transcription downstream of the DNA and RNA sensors cGAS and RIG-I, respectively. We show that ectopic expression of UL35 diminishes the type I IFN response, while infection with a recombinant HCMV lacking UL35 induces an elevated type I IFN response compared to wildtype HCMV. With a series of luciferase reporter assays and the analysis of signaling kinetics upon HCMV infection, we observed that UL35 downmodulates PRR signaling at the level of the key signaling factor TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1). Finally, we demonstrate that UL35 and TBK1 co-immunoprecipitate when co-expressed in HEK293T cells. In addition, we show that a previously reported cellular binding partner of UL35, O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT), post-translationally GlcNAcylates UL35, but that this modification is not required for the antagonizing effect of UL35 on PRR signaling. In summary, we have identified UL35 as the first HCMV protein to antagonize the type I IFN response at the level of TBK1, thereby enriching our understanding of how this important herpesvirus escapes host immune responses.