Ventricular tachycardia commonly arises within the intraventricular septum and successful catheter ablation of septal tachycardia might be enhanced by transseptal electrode placement. We have evaluated the safety of a transseptal ablation procedure. Arrhythmogenicity and histology were examined after high-energy capacitor discharges were delivered to an intracavitary cathode-anode pair placed on opposite sides of the interventricular septum in pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs. After two discharges of 200 or 100 J proved lethal, paired discharges of 30 or 50 J (10 dogs) or a single discharge of 100 J (four dogs) was used to induce 28 lesions. Acute rhythm changes and risk of induction of ventricular tachycardia by programmed stimulation were measures of arrhythmogenicity. Gross and histologic examination of the hearts after 20 min to 28 days allowed characterization of the evolution of lesions. The conduction system in nearby and remote locations was extensively examined in four dogs. Refractory ventricular fibrillation developed with paired shocks at 200 or 100 J. At lower energy levels, acute ventricular fibrillation occurred with 12 of 20 shocks (60%), but defibrillation was consistently achieved. After ablation, no dog had ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation induced with programmed stimulation. Matching anodal and cathodal lesions spanned the septum without perforation in 10 of 16 dogs, and the lesions were of similar histology. Each contained central areas of hemorrhage surrounded by a region of coagulation necrosis merging with normal myocytes peripherally. There was necrosis and edema without inflammation at 20 min, acute inflammatory cell infiltration at 1 to 2 days, and myocyte replacement by granulation tissue after 6 days. Right ventricular apical perforation occurred near the septum without tamponade in one dog after a single 100 J discharge. There was no damage to the atrioventricular node, His bundle, or bundle branches in four dogs. We conclude that low-energy, paired-capacitor discharges can be safely applied through catheter electrodes that straddle the ventricular septum. Permanent cathodal and anodal injury results, without structural damage to the proximal conduction system. Circulation 74, No. 3, 637-644, 1986. LEFT SEPTAL endocardial resection has been used for control of arrhythmias in patients with ventricular tachycardia arising from the ventricular septum. 1-3 For those patients with an intramural septal location of the ventricular tachycardia focus, a more extensive ablative procedure might be required for optimal results. We reasoned that successful localization and ablation might be enhanced if tissue mediating the tachycardia were straddled by electrodes on both sides of the septum. To test the safety of this approach, a study was performed to determine lesion inorphology, degree of transseptal injury, and risk of

Five patients with chronic or recurrent ectopic supraventricular tachycardias unresponsive to drugs underwent programmed stimulation, endocardial mapping, and attempted catheter ablation of the arrhythmia focus. For attempted ablation, an intracardiac electrode catheter was positioned near the exit point of the tachycardia and served as the cathode while a chest wall patch served as the anode. In two patients with tachycardia originating near the coronary sinus, discharges of 200 or 400 J each were delivered to two electrodes at the earliest area of endocardial activation. These two patients with incessant tachycardia remain free of tachycardia for 17 and 11 months, respectively. In one patient with tachycardia originating from the right atrial appendage, both catheter and surgical ablation proved unsuccessful in that a new focus of atrial tachycardia supervened. This patient subsequently underwent successful catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction. Two patients with junctional tachycardia underwent catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction. Complete atrioventricular block followed atrioventricular junctional ablation and these patients required permanent cardiac pacing. The junctional tachycardia was replaced by sinus rhythm with episodes of unsustained atrial tachycardia. However, after 13 +/- 5 months follow-up, neither of the patients require antiarrhythmic drugs. Catheter ablation can be effective for atrial foci near the coronary sinus os, and can be performed with preservation of atrioventricular conduction. Arrhythmia ablation is possible in those with atrioventricular junctional tachycardia but requires the sacrifice of atrioventricular conduction. After ablation, other automatic atrial foci may become operative and complicate use of dual-chamber pacemakers.

Although monopolar radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is being used to interrupt left-sided accessory pathways in patients with tachyarrhythmia, little is known of the histologic effects from this method of treatment. RF ablation at the mitral valve (MV) annulus was performed in ten dogs to examine the histology of the lesion area. A custom 6 French ablation catheter with a 4 mm distal electrode was positioned beneath the MV adjacent to the annulus. Mean preablation atrial to ventricular electrogram ratio (A/V ratio) was 0.26 +/- 0.17. Thirty +/- 1 watts of RF power were applied for 53 +/- 13 seconds between the distal electrode and a large skin electrode. Nine dogs were sacrificed 6 weeks and one dog 2 days following ablation. Annular lesions were seen in eight of the ten dogs. Lesion volume was 136 +/- 41 mm3 and correlated with the A/V ratio (r2 = 0.74, P = 0.006). Lesions consisted of necrosis of the left ventricle with extension into the atrioventricular groove and left atrium. No injury to the coronary sinus or circumflex artery was observed. A small area of injury was noticed on the mitral leaflet in one dog. Monopolar RF ablation creates lesions at the MV annulus without injury to adjacent vascular structures.