No abstract

The effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related compounds occur via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a member of the basic helix-loop-helix-Per-ARNT-Sim homology (bHLH-PAS) protein superfamily. A single AHR gene has been identified in mammals, whereas many fish species, including the Atlantic killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) possess two distinct AHR genes (AHR1 and a novel form, AHR2). A mouse bHLH-PAS protein closely related to AHR and designated AHR repressor (AHRR) is induced by 3-methylcholanthrene and represses the transcriptional activity of the AHR. To determine whether AHRR is the mammalian ortholog of fish AHR2 and to investigate the mechanisms by which AHRR regulates AHR function, we cloned an AHRR ortholog in F. heteroclitus with high sequence identity to the mouse and human AHRRs. Killifish AHRR encodes a 680-residue protein with a predicted molecular mass of 75.2 kDa. We show that in vitro expressed AHRR proteins from human, mouse, and killifish all fail to bind [(3)H]TCDD or [(3)H]beta-naphthoflavone. In transient transfection experiments using a luciferase reporter gene under control of AHR response elements, killifish AHRR inhibited the TCDD-dependent transactivation function of both AHR1 and AHR2. AHRR mRNA is widely expressed in killifish tissues and is inducible by TCDD or polychlorinated biphenyls, but its expression is not altered in a population of fish exhibiting genetic resistance to these compounds. The F. heteroclitus AHRR promoter contains three putative AHR response elements. Both AHR1 and AHR2 activated transcription of luciferase driven by the AHRR promoter, and AHRR could repress its own promoter. Thus, AHRR is an evolutionarily conserved, TCDD-inducible repressor of AHR1 and AHR2 function. Phylogenetic analysis shows that AHRR, AHR1, and AHR2 are distinct genes, members of an AHR gene family; these three vertebrate AHR-like genes descended from a single invertebrate AHR.

Yeast RNA polymerase II enzymes containing single amino acid substitutions in the second largest subunit were analyzed in vitro for elongation-related defects. Mutants were chosen for analysis based on their ability to render yeast cells sensitive to growth on medium containing 6-azauracil. RNA polymerase II purified from three different 6-azauracil-sensitive yeast strains displayed increased arrest at well characterized arrest sites in vitro. The extent of this defect did not correlate with sensitivity to growth in the presence of 6-azauracil. The most severe effect resulted from mutation rpb2-10 (P1018S), which occurs in region H, a domain highly conserved between prokaryotic and eukaryotic RNA polymerases that is associated with nucleotide binding. The average elongation rate of this mutant enzyme is also slower than wild type. We suggest that the slowed elongation rate and an increase in dwell time of elongating pol II leads to rpb2-10's arrest-prone phenotype. This mutant enzyme can respond to SII for transcriptional read-through and carry out SII-activated nascent RNA cleavage.RNA polymerase II (pol II) 1 can encounter a variety of transcriptional blocks during the elongation phase of RNA synthesis. These include DNA sequences (reviewed in , DNA bound proteins (Deuschle et al., 1990;Izban and Luse, 1991;Kuhn et al., 1990;Reines and Mote, 1993), DNA binding drugs (Mote et al., 1994), and covalent modifications due to DNA damage (Donahue et al., 1994). In vitro studies have identified mechanisms by which elongating pol II can overcome some of these obstacles. Intrinsic DNA sequences that cause pol II to become arrested have been most extensively investigated and are frequently employed as a model in studies of transcriptional arrest.Stably arrested pol II can be reactivated for RNA chain extension by elongation factor SII. SII binds the enzyme and activates a ribonuclease activity thought to reside within pol II (reviewed in ). This ribonuclease removes a small number of nucleotides from the 3′ end of the nascent RNA prior to its re-extension through the blockage Luse, 1993a, 1993b;Gu and Reines, 1995b) in a reiterative cleavage and resynthesis process, allowing a pol II molecule multiple attempts at chain extension through an obstacle (Gu et al

No abstract

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is a potent developmental toxicant in most vertebrates. However, frogs are relatively insensitive to TCDD toxicity, especially during early life stages. Toxicity of TCDD and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons is mediated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), and specific differences in properties of the AhR signaling pathway can underlie in TCDD toxicity in different species. This study investigated the role of AhR in frog TCDD insensitivity, using Xenopus laevis as a model system. X. laevis, a pseudotetraploid species, expresses two distinct AhR1 genes, AhR1alpha and AhR1beta. Sharing 86% amino acid identity, these likely represent distinct genes, both orthologous to mammalian AhR and paralogous to the AhR2 gene(s) in most fish. Both AhR1alpha and AhR1beta exhibit TCDD-dependent binding of cognate DNA sequences, but they bind TCDD with at least 20-fold lower affinity than the mouse AhR(b-1) protein, and they are similarly less responsive in TCDD-induced reporter gene induction in conjunction with the mouse CYP1A1 promoter. Furthermore, CYP1A6 and CYP1A7 induction by TCDD in cultured X. laevis A6 cells appears much less responsive than CYP1A induction in cell lines derived from more sensitive animals. Taken together, these data suggest that low affinity binding by X. laevis AhRs plays an important mechanistic role in the insensitivity of frogs to TCDD. An understanding of these molecular mechanisms should aid amphibian ecotoxicology and refine the use of frog embryos as a model [e.g. in FETAX (Frog Embryo Teratogenesis Assay-Xenopus)] for determining developmental toxicity of samples containing dioxin-like compounds.