From June to August 2015, China’s security market suffered a severe decline due to the impact of the stock market crash. For this reason, the Shanghai Stock Exchange issued a notice on December 4, 2015, deciding to implement the circuit breaker mechanism on January 1, 2016. However, the mechanism was abolished only four days after its implementation. Therefore, this paper provides an empirical effectiveness analysis of this circuit breaker mechanism based on the nine CSI 300 industries using the regression discontinuity design method. The empirical results show that the implementation of the circuit breaker mechanism has led to the breakpoints of volatilities in nine industries and has significantly increased its market fluctuation. Moreover, we also find that the implementation of the circuit breaker mechanism has different impacts on the different industries, such as the effectiveness of the public, and consumer industries are at the medium level and show more stable fluctuations. Therefore, we suggest that the further circuit breaker mechanism in China’s financial markets can be piloted from the public and consumer industries rather than directly implementing it on the whole CSI 300.
This article analyzes the development of China's Internet finance and the status quo of traditional commercial banks and the impact of Internet finance on traditional commercial banks under the background of "One Belt One Road" strategy, in order to better grasp the historical opportunities and promote the innovation of commercial banks, this will drive the emerging financial development model and give greater play to the historical role of the "One Belt One Road" strategy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.