Background: COVID-19 is a novel disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. Methods: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of patients admitted with COVID-19 to one site in March 2020. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: survivors who did not receive mechanical ventilation (MV), survivors who received MV, and those who received MV and died during hospitalization. Results: There were 140 hospitalizations; 22 deaths (mortality rate 15.7%), 83 (59%) survived and did not receive MV, 35 (25%) received MV and survived; 18 (12.9%) received MV and died. Thee mean age of each group was 57.8, 55.8 and 72.7 years, respectively (P = .0001). Of those who received MV and died, 61% were male (P = .01). More than half the patients (n = 90, 64%) were African American. First measured d-dimer >575.5 ng/mL, procalcitonin > 0.24 ng/mL, lactate dehydrogenase >445.6 units/L, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) >104.75 pg/mL had odds ratios of 10.5, 5, 4.5 and 2.9, respectively for MV (P < .05 for all). Peak BNP >167.5 pg/mL had an odds ratio of 6.7 for inpatient mortality when mechanically ventilated (P = .02). Conclusions: Age and gender may impact outcomes in COVID-19. D-dimer, procalcitonin, lactate dehydrogenase and BNP may serve as early indicators of disease trajectory.
Background and Aims Initial reports on US COVID-19 showed different outcomes in different races. In this study we use a diverse large cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients to determine predictors of mortality. Methods We analyzed data from hospitalized COVID-19 patients (n = 5852) between March 2020- August 2020 from 8 hospitals across the US. Demographics, comorbidities, symptoms and laboratory data were collected. Results The cohort contained 3,662 (61.7%) African Americans (AA), 286 (5%) American Latinx (LAT), 1,407 (23.9%), European Americans (EA), and 93 (1.5%) American Asians (AS). Survivors and non-survivors mean ages in years were 58 and 68 for AA, 58 and 77 for EA, 44 and 61 for LAT, and 51 and 63 for AS. Mortality rates for AA, LAT, EA and AS were 14.8, 7.3, 16.3 and 2.2%. Mortality increased among patients with the following characteristics: age, male gender, New York region, cardiac disease, COPD, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, history of cancer, immunosuppression, elevated lymphocytes, CRP, ferritin, D-Dimer, creatinine, troponin, and procalcitonin. Use of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.001), shortness of breath (SOB) (p < 0.01), fatigue (p = 0.04), diarrhea (p = 0.02), and increased AST (p < 0.01), significantly correlated with death in multivariate analysis. Male sex and EA and AA race/ethnicity had higher frequency of death. Diarrhea was among the most common GI symptom amongst AAs (6.8%). When adjusting for comorbidities, significant variables among the demographics of study population were age (over 45 years old), male sex, EA, and patients hospitalized in New York. When adjusting for disease severity, significant variables were age over 65 years old, male sex, EA as well as having SOB, elevated CRP and D-dimer. Glucocorticoid usage was associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 death in our cohort. Conclusion Among this large cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients enriched for African Americans, our study findings may reflect the extent of systemic organ involvement by SARS-CoV-2 and subsequent progression to multi-system organ failure. High mortality in AA in comparison with LAT is likely related to high frequency of comorbidities and older age among AA. Glucocorticoids should be used carefully considering the poor outcomes associated with it. Special focus in treating patients with elevated liver enzymes and other inflammatory biomarkers such as CRP, troponin, ferritin, procalcitonin, and D-dimer are required to prevent poor outcomes.
SUMMARY Goal: As strategies emerge to off-load hospital systems and prevent readmissions amid the COVID-19 pandemic, pragmatic assessments of readmission risk become increasingly important. The simplified HOSPITAL score is an extensively validated tool that predicts 30-day potentially avoidable readmission (PAR). Scores of 0 to 4 predict a 30-day PAR risk of 6.4%, while scores ≥ 5 predict a 30-day PAR risk of 17.3%. Its role in patients with COVID-19 is unknown. Our goal was to assess the simplified HOSPITAL score’s accuracy in patients with COVID-19 and explore outcomes related to a hospital-at-home program. Methods: Patients discharged following an admission for clinically symptomatic COVID-19 from two hospitals belonging to the same healthcare system in the Midwest were included. Those who died, discharged to hospice or an acute care hospital, whose length of stay was < 1 day, or who discharged against medical advice were excluded. The simplified HOSPITAL score was tabulated for included patients to predict their 30-day PAR risk. The Brier score was calculated to compare the observed rates of 30-day readmission with rates predicted by the simplified HOSPITAL score. Prediction models with a Brier score <.25 are considered useful. Principal Findings: Among 612 patients, the overall 30-day PAR rate was 10.1%. Most patients (n = 522 [85.3%]) had simplified HOSPITAL scores of 0 to 4, and 41 (7.8%) of these patients were readmitted. Among the 90 patients (14.7%) with scores ≥5, 21 (23.3%) were readmitted. The Brier score was 0.088, indicating very good accuracy between the predicted readmission risk and observed readmissions. In patients with scores 0 to 4, readmissions were highest in those discharged to acute or subacute rehabilitation (10.4% [8/77]), intermediate in those discharged home (8.1% [32/394]), and lowest in those discharged to hospital at home (1.9% [1/51]). However, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Application to Practice: The simplified HOSPITAL score was accurate in patients with COVID-19 and can be used to direct resources toward those predicted to be at increased risk for readmission and to assess outcomes from readmission reduction strategies. Hospitals at home may be a promising strategy to decrease readmissions in patients with COVID-19.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.