The bi-atom catalysts (BACs) have attracted increasing attention in important electrocatalytic reactions such as oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Here, by means of density functional theory simulations coupled with machine-learning technology,...
We have studied the batch and continuous extractive distillation of minimum-and maximum-boiling azeotropic mixtures with a heavy entrainer. These systems exhibit class 1.0-1a and 1.0-2 ternary diagrams, each with two subcases depending on the location of the univolatility line. The feasible product and feasible ranges of the operating parameters reflux ratio (R) and entrainer/feed flow rate ratio for continuous (F E /F) and batch (F E /V) operation were assessed. Class 1.0-1a processes allow the recovery of only one product because of the location of the univolatility line above a minimum value of the entrainer/feed flow rate ratio for both batch and continuous processes. A minimum reflux ratio R also exists. For an identical target purity, the minimum feed ratio is higher for the continuous process than for the batch process, for the continuous process where stricter feasible conditions arise because the composition profile of the stripping section must intersect that of the extractive section. Class 1.0-2 mixtures allow either A or B to be obtained as a product, depending on the feed location. Then, the univolatility line location sets limiting values for either the maximum or minimum of the feed ratio F E /F. Again, the feasible range of operating parameters for the continuous process is smaller than that for the batch process. Entrainer comparison in terms of minimum reflux ratio and minimum entrainer/feed ratio is enabled by the proposed methodology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.