No abstract

No abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Effective biomarkers and specific therapeutic targets for HCC are therefore urgently needed. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) plays a crucial role in numerous cancer types; however, its functions in HCC require further exploration. In the present study, we found a remarkable difference in GPER staining between tumor tissue (100/141, 70.9%) and matched non-tumor tissue (27/30, 90.0%). Compared with the GPER-negative patients, the GPER-positive patients with HCC were closely associated with female sex, negative hepatitis B surface antigen, small tumor size, low serum alpha fetoprotein level, and longer overall survival. Treatment with GPER-specific agonist G1 led to the sustained and transient activation of the EGFR/ERK and EGFR/AKT signaling pathways, respectively, in the HCC cell lines HCCLM3 and SMMC-7721, which express high levels of GPER. Interestingly, G1-induced EGFR/ERK signaling, rather than EGFR/AKT signaling mediated by GPER, was involved in decreasing cell viability by blocking cell cycle progression, thereby promoting apoptosis and inhibiting cell growth. Clinical analysis indicated that simultaneous high expression of GPER and phosphorylated-ERK (p-ERK) predicted improved prognosis for HCC. Finally, the activation of GPER/ERK signaling remarkably suppressed tumor growth in an HCC xenograft model, and this result was consistent with the in vitro data. Our findings suggest that specific activation of the GPER/ERK axis may serve as a novel tumor-suppressive mechanism and that this axis could be a therapeutic target for HCC.

This study aimed to investigate the anti‐tumour effect of apatinib on extensive‐stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and elucidate the associated mechanisms. NCI‐H345 cells were selected as model cells because of high expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and phosphorylated‐VEGFR2 (pVEGFR2). Cells were exposed to recombinant human VEGF (rhVEGF) and apatinib. Cells were then divided into eight groups, namely, control, rhVEGF, apatinib, rhVEGF+apatinib, serum‐free medium (SM), SM+rhVEGF, SM+apatinib and SM+rhVEGF+apatinib. In comparison with the control group, cell proliferation in vitro in apatinib, SM, SM+apatinib and SM+rhVEGF+apatinib groups was inhibited, particularly in SM+apatinib group. The effect of apatinib on tumour growth in vivo was investigated using a mouse xenograft tumour model. In comparison with the control group, tumour sizes were reduced in apatinib‐treated group on days 34 and 37. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining revealed that VEGF, pVEGFR2, PI3K, AKT, p‐ERK1/2, Ki‐67 and CD31 in the tumour cells of apatinib‐treated group were downregulated compared with control group. Haematoxylin and eosin staining revealed that apatinib promoted the necrosis of SCLC cells in vivo. In conclusion, apatinib inhibited the growth of SCLC cells by downregulating the expression of VEGF, pVEGFR2, p‐PI3K, p‐AKT, p‐ERK1/2, Ki‐67 and CD31.