No abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic nodules (≤2cm). We retrospectively evaluated 56 CEUS exam records of hepatic nodules (≤2cm) performed between January 2015 and July 2016 at West China hospital. Each nodule was classified into a LI-RADS-CEUS category by two radiologists according to imaging features. The ultimate CEUS categories were then compared with pathological reports and their correlation was then calculated. Inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS between reader A and B was κ, 0.690, illustrating good consistency. The diagnostic accuracy of LR-5 on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was 86.49% but 11.11% for LR-M. LI-RADS-CEUS is a potential standardized categorization system for high-risk HCC patients but might also increase the false-negative diagnosis of nodules of less than 2cm.

Use of stiffness values measured in the liver parenchyma at more than 2 cm from the lesion allowed better diagnostic performance than did values measured in a region closer to the tumor. Stiffness value was more accurate than stiffness ratio for differentiation of malignant from benign focal liver lesions, but the stiffness ratio might be useful for subclassification of benign and malignant lesions. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

No abstract

Purpose To investigate the capabilities of stiffness value and serum biomarkers in the staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), with pathologic findings in large surgical specimens serving as the reference standard. Materials and Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Liver stiffness (determined by means of ultrasonography-based elastography point quantification), aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index (APRI), and fibrosis index (based on the four-factor Fibrosis-4 [FIB-4] calculation) were obtained in 386 patients with CHB. With pathologic fibrosis stages in large surgical specimens as the reference standard, capabilities and cutoffs of stiffness and serum biomarkers were first investigated in a cohort of 284 patients and then validated in an independent cohort of 102 patients by means of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. Results Liver stiffness demonstrated significantly stronger correlation with fibrosis stages than did APRI and FIB-4 (r = 0.738 vs r = 0.477 vs r = 0.427, respectively; P < .05 for all). In the development cohort, liver stiffness had significantly higher AUCs in identifying fibrosis of stage 1 or higher, stage 2 or higher, stage 3 or higher, and stage 4 or higher (0.97, 0.96, 0.91, and 0.87, respectively) than APRI (0.89, 0.84, 0.73, and 0.74, respectively) and FIB-4 (0.82, 0.79, 0.70, and 0.72, respectively). In the validation cohort, liver stiffness was validated as showing significantly higher AUCs in identifying fibrosis of stage 1 or higher, stage 2 or higher, stage 3 or higher, and stage 4 or higher (0.99, 0.95, 0.89, and 0.88, respectively) than APRI (0.83, 0.76, 0.78, and 0.68, respectively) and FIB-4 (0.76, 0.69, 0.75, and 0.67, respectively). Conclusion Liver stiffness demonstrated considerable capability in identifying each stage of liver fibrosis in patients with CHB, whereas serum biomarkers showed limited capabilities. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.