Tuberculosis (TB), caused by the human pathogens Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and Mycobacterium africanum, has plagued humanity for millennia and remains the deadliest infectious disease in the modern world. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. africanum can be subdivided phylogenetically into seven lineages exhibiting a low but significant degree of genomic diversity and preferential geographic distributions. Human genetic variability impacts all stages of TB pathogenesis ranging from susceptibility to infection with Mtb, progression of infection to disease, and the development of distinct clinical subtypes. The genetic study of severe childhood TB identified strong inborn single-gene errors revealing crucial pathways of vulnerability to TB. However, the identification of major TB-susceptibility genes on the population level has remained elusive. In particular, the replication of findings from candidate and genome-wide association studies across distinct human populations has proven difficult, thus hampering the characterization of reliable host molecular markers of susceptibility. Among the possible confounding factors of genetic association studies is Mtb genomic variability, which generally was not taken into account by human genetic studies. In support of this possibility, Mtb lineage was found to be a contributing factor to clinical presentation of TB and epidemiological spread of Mtb in exposed populations. The confluence of pathogen and human host genetic variability to TB pathogenesis led to the consideration of a possible coadaptation of Mtb strains and their human hosts, which should reveal itself in significant interaction effects between Mtb strain and TB-susceptibility/resistance alleles. Here, we present some of the most consistent findings of genetic susceptibility factors in human TB and review studies that point to genome-to-genome interaction between humans and Mtb lineages. The limited results available so far suggest that analyses considering joint human–Mtb genomic variability may provide improved power for the discovery of pathogenic drivers of the ongoing TB epidemic.

Mycobacterial diseases are caused by members of the genus Mycobacterium, acid-fast bacteria characterized by the presence of mycolic acids within their cell walls. Claiming almost 2 million lives every year, tuberculosis (TB) is the most common mycobacterial disease and is caused by infection with M. tuberculosis and, in rare cases, by M. bovis or M. africanum. The second and third most common mycobacterial diseases are leprosy and buruli ulcer (BU), respectively. Both diseases affect the skin and can lead to permanent sequelae and deformities. Leprosy is caused by the uncultivable M. leprae while the etiological agent of BU is the environmental bacterium M. ulcerans. After exposure to these mycobacterial species, a majority of individuals will not progress to clinical disease and, among those who do, inter-individual variability in disease manifestation and outcome can be observed. Susceptibility to mycobacterial diseases carries a human genetic component and intense efforts have been applied over the past decades to decipher the exact nature of the genetic factors controlling disease susceptibility. While for BU this search was mostly conducted on the basis of candidate genes association studies, genome-wide approaches have been widely applied for TB and leprosy. In this review, we summarize some of the findings achieved by genome-wide linkage, association and transcriptome analyses in TB disease and leprosy and the recent genetic findings for BU susceptibility.

Persons living with HIV (PLWH) are at increased risk of tuberculosis (TB). HIV-associated TB is often the result of recent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) followed by rapid progression to disease. Alveolar macrophages (AM) are the first cells of the innate immune system that engage Mtb, but how HIV and antiretroviral therapy (ART) impact on the antimycobacterial response of AM is not known. To investigate the impact of HIV and ART on the transcriptomic and epigenetic response of AM to Mtb, we obtained AM by bronchoalveolar lavage from 20 PLWH receiving ART, 16 control subjects who were HIV-free (HC), and 14 subjects who received ART as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV infection. Following in-vitro challenge with Mtb, AM from each group displayed overlapping but distinct profiles of significantly up-and down-regulated genes in response to Mtb. Comparatively, AM isolated from both PLWH and PrEP subjects presented a substantially weaker transcriptional response. In addition, AM from HC subjects challenged with Mtb responded with pronounced chromatin accessibility changes while AM obtained from PLWH and PrEP subjects displayed no significant changes in their chromatin state. Collectively, these results revealed a stronger adverse effect of ART than HIV on the epigenetic landscape and transcriptional responsiveness of AM.