No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background: The superiority of the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and external fixation remains uncertain owing to the limited sample size involved in the literature. This retrospective cohort research was implemented for the comparison of the efficiency of ORIF and external fixation utilizing the locked volar plating in treating the intra-articular fractures of distal radius. We hypothesized that compared with the external fixation, ORIF can improve the functional scores and reduce complications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective and single-center cohort trial that was approved by institutional review committee of Gansu Provincial Hospital. From June 2016 to July 2018, in our experiment, 178 patients with intra-articular fractures of the distal radius were recruited. Inclusion criteria in this cohort study were designed as follows: the age of patients is between 18 and 65 years, the patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists level I–III, and with the AO-type C3 or C2 fractures of distal radius confirmed by computed tomography scans, the patients with radiographic clinical follow-up for 1 year or >1 year. The patients participating in the trial would be divided into 2 groups: the patients treated via the external fixation and the patients treated by the ORIF utilizing volar plate. The main functional results were the grip strength and the range of motion of wrist. Radiographic measurement and complications were also evaluated in our study. Results: This study protocol will guide and clarify our assignments, and the final outcomes and conclusion will further enrich the clinical knowledge in the literature. Trial registration: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry6116).

Background. Staples closure technology has been widely used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and achieved good results. In recent years, a new type of material called skin closure tape (SCT) has been applied to TKA which also showed good treatment results. However, since it is still not clear yet which one is better, this paper collects literatures for statistical analysis so as to provide evidence for the use of SCT in TKA. Methods. The comparative study on effects between SCT and staples is reviewed after the primary release of TKA in PubMed, the Cochrane library, and the EMBASE database up to March 2019. The two researchers independently screened the literature and evaluated the quality of the literature using bias risk tools. Results. A total of four studies (3330 knees) have been included in our meta-analysis. For the main point, the results show that the SCT can reduce readmission rates compared to staples (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49–0.95, P=0.03), with no significant difference in complications (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.27–2.64, P=0.77). Secondly, the results suggest that although there is no significant difference in removal time between the two groups, the SCT can reduce pains, save time and costs, and have a better cosmetic effect. Conclusions. Our study indicates SCT as a closure method with fewer complications and faster speed compared with staples. Nevertheless, the cost and pain need to be further confirmed because of the small sample size included in this study.