BACKGROUND: Approved systemic treatments for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) were limited to chemotherapy regimens that have moderate survival benefit with poor outcomes. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed clinical benefit in other tumour types, including first-line non-small cell lung cancer. We hypothesised that this regimen would improve overall survival in MPM. METHODS:This open-label phase 3 study was conducted at 103 hospitals across 21 countries. Adults with previously untreated, histologically confirmed unresectable MPM were randomised (1:1) to nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously Q2W) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously Q6W) for ≤2 years, or platinum plus pemetrexed chemotherapy (pemetrexed [500 mg/m 2 intravenously] plus cisplatin [75 mg/m 2 intravenously] or carboplatin [AUC 5 mg/mL/min intravenously]) Q3W for up to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (all randomised patients); safety was assessed in all treated patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02899299. FINDINGS:Between November 29, 2016 and April 18, 2018, 713 patients were enrolled; 303 were randomised to nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 302 to chemotherapy. At the prespecified interim analysis (median follow-up 29•7 months [IQR,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32]), nivolumab plus ipilimumab significantly prolonged overall survival versus chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 18•1 months (95% CI 16•8-21•4) versus 14•1 months (95% CI 12•4-16•2), with a hazard ratio of 0•74 (96•6% CI 0•60-0•91; p=0•0020); 2year overall survival rates were 41% (95% CI 35•1-46•5) and 27% (95% CI 21•9-32•4), respectively.Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 91 (30%) of 300 patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 91 (32%) of 284 treated with chemotherapy. There were three (1%) and one (<1%) treatment-related deaths, respectively. INTERPRETATION:Nivolumab plus ipilimumab provided statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in overall survival versus standard-of-care chemotherapy, supporting the use of this first-in-class approved (United States) regimen for previously untreated unresectable MPM.

Because of socioeconomic factors, many patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) do not receive immunotherapy in the first-line setting. It is unknown if the combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy can provide clinical benefits in immunotherapy-naive patients with disease progression after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy.OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of pembrolizumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC following platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of EGFR variants or programmed cell death ligand 1 status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThe Pembrolizumab Plus Docetaxel for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (PROLUNG) trial randomized 78 patients with histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC in a 1:1 ratio to receive either pembrolizumab plus docetaxel or docetaxel alone from December 2016 through May 2019. INTERVENTIONSThe experimental arm received docetaxel on day 1 (75 mg/m 2 ) plus pembrolizumab on day 8 (200 mg) every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles followed by pembrolizumab maintenance until progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The control arm received docetaxel monotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. RESULTS Among 78 recruited patients, 32 (41%) were men, 34 (44%) were never smokers, and 25 (32%) had an EGFR/ALK alteration. Forty patients were allocated to receive pembrolizumab plus docetaxel, and 38 were allocated to receive docetaxel. A statistically significant difference in ORR, assessed by an independent reviewer, was found in patients receiving pembrolizumab plus docetaxel vs patients receiving docetaxel (42.5% vs 15.8%; odds ratio, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.34-11.54; P = .01). Patients without EGFR variations had a considerable difference in ORR of 35.7% vs 12.0% (P = .06), whereas patients with EGFR variations had an ORR of 58.3% vs 23.1% (P = .14). Overall, PFS was longer in patients who received pembrolizumab plus docetaxel (9.5 months; 95% CI, 4.2-not reached) than in patients who received docetaxel (3.9 months; 95% CI, 3.2-5.7) (hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13-0.46; P < .001). For patients without variations, PFS was 9.5 months (95% CI, 3.9-not reached) vs 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.5-5.3) (P < .001), whereas in patients with EGFR variations, PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-not reached) vs 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.3-6.2) (P = .04). In terms of safety, 23% (9 of 40) vs 5% (2 of 38) of patients experienced grade 1 to 2 pneumonitis in the pembrolizumab plus docetaxel and docetaxel arms, respectively (P = .03), while 28% (11 of 40) vs 3% (1 of 38) experienced any-grade hypothyroidism (P = .002). No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn this phase 2 study, the combination of pembrolizumab plus docetaxel was well tolerated and substantially improved ORR and PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC who had previous progression after platinum-based chem...

events (63%) in the mITT population. Median PFS was 25.8 months with ensartinib vs 12.7 months with crizotinib (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.75; P¼.0003 by log-rank test) with a median follow-up of 23.8 and 20.2 months in the ITT population. Median PFS was not reached with ensartinib vs 12.7 months with crizotinib in the mITT population (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32-0.71; P¼.0002 by log-rank test). In the mITT population, ORR by BIRC was 75% (91/121) with ensartinib vs 67% (85/126) with crizotinib; among patients with measurable brain metastases, the BIRC-assessed intracranial ORR was 54% (7/13) with ensartinib vs 19% (4/21) with crizotinib; TTF rate in the brain in patients with no baseline brain metastases was lower with ensartinib vs crizotinib (4% vs 24% at 12 months; cause-specific HR, 0.33; P¼.0016). Median OS was not reached in both arms (HR¼0.91) in the mITT population; 24-month OS rate was 78% in both arms. No new safety signals were noted. Full safety profile and subgroup analyses will be reported at the meeting. Conclusion: In patients with ALK+ NSCLC, ensartinib significantly prolonged PFS over crizotinib with a favorable safety profile, representing a new option in the first-line setting. Disclosure: No significant relationships.

No abstract

No abstract