No abstract

Electric vehicle (EV) owners enjoy many positive aspects when driving their cars, including low running costs and zero tailpipe gas emissions, which makes EVs a clean technology provided that they are sourced through renewable sources, e.g., biomass, solar power, or wind energy. However, their driving behaviour is often negatively affected by the so-called range anxiety phenomenon, i.e., a concern that an EV might not have enough driving range to reach the desired destination due to its limited battery size. The perception of range anxiety may also affect potential buyers in their decisions on whether to purchase an internal combustion engine vehicle as opposed to an EV. This paper investigates some factors that influence range anxiety through a comparative analysis of two target groups: (i) existing EV owners, and (ii) non-EV owners (i.e., potential EV owners). The specially crafted survey was used to collect range anxiety data from more than 200 participants. In particular, participants provided their perceptions on (i) the potential relationship between existing gas station infrastructure and the desired EV charging station infrastructure, and (ii) the potential relationship between range anxiety and two influencing variables, namely the current state of charge and remaining range. Concerning the existing gas station infrastructure, evidence suggests that both target groups think that the distances between gas stations could be increased. Moreover, our analysis shows that the desired distances between charging stations correspond to the distances between the existing gas stations, which indicates that both EV owners and non-EV owners have a common view on the optimal gas station and charging station topology. Furthermore, we find that the type of settlement (urban vs rural) influences preferred distances, where both target groups living in cities desire shorter distances, and that non-EV owners, as opposed to EV owners, are more prone to be affected by the state of charge and remaining range. Quantitatively, we are able to define a measure for range anxiety, which is connected with the preferred distance between two neighbouring charging stations. Throughout our analyses, we find that the mean preferred distance between two neighbouring charging stations is 7 km, but this value significantly differs based on the settlement type of a (potential) EV owner.

No abstract

No abstract

Summary Current trends suggest that there is a substantial increase in the overall usage of electric vehicles (EVs). This, in turn, is causing drastic changes in the transportation industry and, more broadly, in business, policy making, and society. One concrete challenge brought by the increase in the number of EVs is a higher demand for charging stations. This paper presents a methodology to address the challenge of EV charging station deployment. The proposed methodology combines multiple sources of heterogeneous real‐world data for the sake of deriving insights that can be of a great value to decision makers in the field, such as EV charging infrastructure providers and/or local governments. Our starting point is the business data, ie, data describing charging infrastructure, historical data about charging transactions, and information about competitors in the market. Another type of data used are geographical data, such as places of interest located around chargers (eg, hospitals, restaurants, and shops) and driving distances between available chargers. The merged data from different sources are used to predict charging station utilization when EV charging infrastructure and/or contextual data change, eg, when another charging station or a place of interest is created. On the basis of such predictions, we suggest where to deploy new charging stations. We foresee that the proposed methodology can be used by EV charging infrastructure providers and/or local governments as a decision support tool that prescribes an optimal area to place a new charging station while keeping a desired level of utilization of the charging stations. We showcase the proposed methodology with an illustrative example involving the Dutch EV charging infrastructure through the period from 2013 to 2016. Specifically, we prescribe the optimal location for new ELaadNL charging stations based on different objectives such as maximizing the overall charging network utilization and/or increasing the number of chargers in scarcely populated areas.