The existing studies have indicated that abusive supervision affects creativity; however, the specific impact mechanism is still unclear due to the uncertain relationship between leadership and employee creativity. Based on the resource perspective, this study examines the influence of abusive supervision on creativity through psychological availability (PA) and the moderating of this mediation by performance improvement attribution (PIA). Based on a survey of 234 employees', the hypotheses have been tested and the results reveal that abusive supervision had a detrimental effect on employee creativity partially mediated by employee PA, and employees' PIA moderated the mediation. This study offers new insights into the mechanisms associated with the relationship between abusive supervision and creativity.

PurposeBuyer engagement proves important supports for suppliers' corporate social responsibility (CSR); however, little is known about whether and how buyer CSR engagement can be actively searched for by a supplier and what activities and policies of suppliers could enhance buyer CSR engagement. From the perspective of resource dependence theory, this study aims to explore how suppliers seek to achieve buyers' CSR engagement.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed model and hypotheses were tested by structural equation modeling methodology using survey data collected from 243 manufacturing and service firms in China.FindingsThe results show that instrumental CSR motives and internalization of CSR policies jointly improve buyers' dependence, which in turn increases buyers' CSR engagement. In addition, this study investigates the influence of suppliers' trust on the effect of buyers' dependence on buyers' CSR engagement and finds a negative moderating effect on the dependence–engagement relation.Practical implicationsThe findings show that suppliers can actively engage in CSR to strengthen their position and improve the buyer CSR engagement. In fact, proactive CSR policies and implementation do pay off in the long run for them.Originality/valueThis study offers a fresh perspective on the role of suppliers in improving CSR. In contrast to much of the literature that has considered buyer-initiated practices and policies, this is the first theoretical and empirical investigation into how suppliers can increase the buyer CSR engagement.

Abstract-the paper analyzes the requirement of digital protection practices of Chinese intangible cultural heritages. The research bases on the comparative study about metadata standards and semantic analysis to put forward the framework and metadata standards of Chinese intangible cultural heritages. The paper also proposes the model and range of application by the metadata standards .

No abstract

Papers expounded the Chinese intangible cultural heritage list system by quantitative statistics and data analysis. According to the existing results and protection systems of Chinese intangible cultural heritage representative list, it puts forward development problems and key points for solution. Index Terms-China, intangible cultural heritage, development analysis, list TABLE I The Protection Efforts of Chinese Intangible Heritage Projects Year Key events 1979 Ministry of culture, State ethnic affairs commission, China federation of literary and art circles had jointly initiated compilation work of "China national folk literature and art books", More than 30 years, hundreds of cultural workers participated in writing the series books. In 2010, the ten sets of books were completed and contained 298 volumes of 395 of the 450 million words in total [2]. 2003 State ethnic affairs commission, Ministry of culture, Ministry of finance, and China federation of literary and art circles had jointly launched the Chinese national folk culture protection project. The project plan cost 17 years. By 2020, China will preliminarily establish a relatively complete intangible cultural heritage protection system. 2004 Ministry of culture, Ministry of finance had jointly issued "Chinese folk culture protection plan". It was the first time to draw up a plan for establishing a national folk culture protection list. 2006 the state council of China had issued a decree which named as "The first batch of national level intangible cultural heritage list". It marked the first batch of national level intangible cultural heritage project formally established, which involving 758 units to be protected, covers 518 national catalogue. 2007 China had carried out the first intangible cultural heritage census all over the country. The work was a scientific, comprehensive, systematic foundation for Chinese national intangible cultural heritage system. 2008 Chinese intangible cultural heritage protection had made a breakthrough. The "Level 4 protection list system" has been gradually established. At the same year, the government also set up the "Intangible cultural heritage inheritance person protection system" and effectively promoted the "Cultural heritage awareness day". 2009 the CPC central committee and the state council of China had jointly issued a number of important documents, which established principles and tasks about intangible cultural heritage protection works in China. The documents determined the "Level 4 protection list system", which included national level, provincial level, city level and country level. The system included naming, awarding, commendation, reward and others ways for protecting intangible cultural heritage and representative inheritance persons in China. 2010 The first intangible cultural heritage census was over. The census cost about 800 million CNY and held more than 71,000 times symposiums, visited more than 1.15 million folk artists, collected about 290,000 projects of precious objects and information, writte...