Introduction: Measures to prevent dental diseases are included in the list of medical care provided by dentists. Modern socio-economic transformations, including in health care, have contributed to the gradual evolution of the patient from the recipient of medical care to the consumer of services. The aim: To study the position of patients regarding the need and effectiveness of preventive dental care. Materials and methods: Study was conducted among 310 patients who were admitted in various municipal and state medical institutions, dental clinics and private dental offices in Uzhhorod. The average age of respondents is 26 years. The survey was conducted using questionnaires. Results: 90% of respondents are willing to pay for dental treatment based on the use of innovative technologies; 64% of people refer to paid services aesthetic therapeutic treatment; 87% of patients agree to pay for orthopedic treatment and 48% - for surgical intervention. Only 16% of respondents consider additional professional hygiene services and ready to pay for it themselves. Survey data show that 43.2% of patients give a doctor the main role in the treatment process. 42.8% of respondents need medical help in the form of advice or counseling for a decision on treatment. 14% of patients prefer to choose their own medical care and control the treatment. Conclusions: Dental prophylactic measures that are implemented in the practice of regulating social and labor relations, the presence of relationships between the physician and the patient develop by socio-psychological laws.

The aim: The paper aims to analyze some aspects of the contemporary discourse which concern the determination of the content and specificity of the right to clone. It also outlines the main trends in the development of legal regulation of cloning within international and national law and order. Materials and methods: Methodologically, this work is based on the system of methods, scientific approaches, techniques and principles with the help of which the realization of the research aim is carried out. There have been applied universal, general scientific and special legal methods. Conclusions: Regarding the findings of the study it is necessary to note the following. First, if there is a shared negative vision of the feasibility of reproductive cloning in general, which is enshrined in international and national legislation, the need for therapeutic cloning remains an unresolved issue. Secondly, medicine advances and accordingly sees new perspectives and innovative developments in the field of therapeutic activity, in particular, related to the results of therapeutic cloning, which can help in the fight against incurable diseases. Hence, there is the necessity of further research aimed at the improvement of the existing mechanisms for implementing therapeutic cloning, and determining its limits and procedural aspects.