Objective: Numerous predictive scores have been developed to help determine which patients with epilepsy or seizures of unknown etiology should undergo neural antibody testing. However, their diagnostic advantage compared to only performing testing in patients with "obvious" indications (e.g., broader features of autoimmune encephalitis, characteristic seizure semiologies) requires further study. We aimed to develop a checklist that identifies patients who have "obvious" indications for neural antibody testing and to compare its diagnostic performance to predictive scores. Methods: We developed the "Obvious" indications for Neural antibody testing in Epilepsy or Seizures (ONES) checklist through literature review. We then retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent neural antibody testing for epilepsy or seizures at our center between March 2019 and January 2021, to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the ONES checklist to the recently proposed Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy and Encephalopathy (APE2)/Antibodies Contributing to Focal Epilepsy Signs and Symptoms (ACES) reflex score.Results: One-hundred seventy patients who underwent neural antibody testing for epilepsy or seizures were identified. Seventy-four of 170 (43.5%) with a known etiology were excluded from sensitivity/specificity analyses; none had a true-positive neural antibody. Of the 96 patients with an unknown etiology, 14 (15%) had a true-positive neural antibody. The proportion of false-positives was significantly higher among patients with a known etiology (3/3, 100%) compared to an unknown etiology (2/16, 13%; p = .01). There was no significant difference of the APE2/ACES reflex score compared to the ONES checklist with regard to sensitivity (93% for both, p > .99) or specificity (71% vs. 78%, p = .18) for truepositive neural antibodies. Significance: Compared to only performing neural antibody testing in patients with epilepsy or seizures of unknown etiology who have "obvious" indications, predictive scores confer no clear diagnostic advantage. Prespecified definitions of | 1659 CHANG et al.

No abstract

A 40-year-old woman was admitted for six months of progressive gait disturbance, lower limb-predominant weakness, stiffness, falls, jaw dystonia, horizontal diplopia, and weight loss. Neurological examination revealed horizontal gaze paresis, limited jaw opening with palpable masseter hypertrophy, and spastic paraparesis with sustained clonus and upgoing plantar responses. MRI revealed T2-hyperintense signal abnormalities in dorsal pons, medulla and upper cervical cord central grey matter extending to C3, without gadolinium enhancement. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed mildly elevated protein and immunoglobulin (IgG) index with CSF-specific oligoclonal bands. Neural autoantibody testing was positive for anti-Ri in CSF and serum by mouse brain indirect immunofluorescence and immunoblot. Testing for aquaporin 4 (AQP4)-IgG and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG by cell-based assay were negative. The patient received methylprednisolone 1 gram for 5 days and intravenous immunoglobulin 2 grams/kilogram over 2 days with prednisone taper, and botulinum toxin injections for jaw dystonia. PET-CT revealed an enlarged left axillary lymph node with high FDG uptake. Left axillary lymph node biopsy confirmed high-grade, locally invasive breast adenocarcinoma. Neurologic stabilization was documented at two-week follow-up after hospital discharge before modified radical mastectomy. Our case demonstrates a clinical triad highly suggestive of anti-Ri-associated paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome (Ri-PNS): gait instability, jaw dystonia, and horizontal gaze paresis. The more slowly progressive course and poor response to immunotherapy help distinguish it from AQP4-IgG seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and MOG-IgG associated disease that share similar radiographic features. Early diagnosis, prompt immunotherapy and cancer treatment are paramount for disease stabilization.