Rationale: Paclitaxel resistance is a major concern when treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. We aimed to identify candidates causing paclitaxel resistance and explore their significance in TNBC therapeutics. Methods: A genome-wide CRISPR screening, integrated with transcriptome analyses, was performed to identify candidates involved in paclitaxel-resistant TNBCs. Cell proliferation, cytotoxicity, immunofluorescent staining, and xenograft assays were conducted to verify the phenotypes of paclitaxel resistance induced by candidate genes, both in vitro and in vivo . RNA sequencing, Western blotting, and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were used to explore the underlying mechanisms. Results: MEF2-interacting transcriptional repressor (MITR), the truncated isoform of histone deacetylase 9 (HDAC9) lacking the deacetylation domain, was enriched in paclitaxel-resistant cells. Elevated MITR expression resulted in increased interleukin-11 (IL11) expression and activation of downstream JAK/STAT3 signaling. Mechanistically, MITR counteracted MEF2A-induced transcriptional suppression of IL11, ultimately causing paclitaxel resistance. By contrast, pharmacological inhibition of JAK1/2 by ruxolitinib reversed paclitaxel resistance both in vitro and in vivo . Conclusion: Our in vitro and in vivo genetic and cellular analyses elucidated the pivotal role of MITR/MEF2A/IL11 axis in paclitaxel resistance and provided a novel therapeutic strategy for TNBC patients to overcome poor chemotherapy responses.
Background. Small-sized primary tumor does not always indicate a better prognosis. We hypothesized that very small primary breast tumors with extensive lymph node (LN) metastases represented an aggressive biologic behavior in stage IV disease. Materials and Methods. Data between 2010 and 2015 were retrieved retrospectively from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database with inclusion criteria of female sex, unilateral, metastatic, and T1/2 invasive ductal carcinoma. Primary study variables included T stage, N stage, grade, metastatic sites, number of involved sites, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. Kaplan-Meier and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models with interaction terms were used. One-, 2-and 3-year breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) was examined according to tumor size. Results. We identified 5,340 eligible patients with breast cancer. In multivariate analysis, race, age, grade, molecular subtype, surgery, brain metastases, and liver metastases were found to be independently associated with BCSM. For T1 tumors, the N0, N1, and N2+ groups had the same BCSM. In tumors smaller than 50 mm, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year BCSM did not decline with the decrease of tumor size. For triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs), the T1a/T1bN2+ group had significantly worse BCSM than any other group did. Conclusion. Patients with stage IV cancer with small-sized tumors may have BCSM as high as those with larger tumors. In TNBCs, very small tumors with severe LN involvement are associated with the worst BCSM. Continued efforts are needed to further investigate Ta1/T1bN2 + M1 TNBCs and individualize the treatment for affected patients. The Oncologist 2020;9999:• • Implications for Practice: This study revealed that for stage IV breast cancer, smaller primary tumors were not always associated with better breast cancer-specific mortality. This study illustrated that very small triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) with extensive regional lymph node involvement may be a surrogate for biologically aggressive disease. Because of poor prognosis of T1a/T1bN2+ TNBCs, there might be an urgent need of more individualized treatment for affected patients. Future correlative studies ought to focus on the genetic and molecular differences in Ta1/T1bN2+ TNBCs that contribute to the biological behavior. Clarification of the regulation mechanism of very small-sized primary TNBCs with metastatic outgrowth in nodes and distant sites will play an integral role in developing targeted therapies.
Osteoarthritis (OA), one of the most common chronic musculoskeletal disorders, is deemed to be correlated with aging. The SIRT1 activator, resveratrol, acts as a crucial regulator of aging and may have a potential therapeutic effect on OA. Rabbit OA models were established through destabilized medial meniscus surgery. A total of 40 healthy male New Zealand rabbits were divided into five groups: control group (sham operation), OA group, as well as low dose (LD), middle dose (MD), and high dose (HD) resveratrol-treated OA groups. 6 weeks after operation, 0.8 ml of normal saline was injected into the knee joints every other day in the control and OA groups, and 0.8 ml of 5, 10, and 15 μmol/L resveratrol was injected into the knee joints every other day in the LD, MD, and HD group, respectively. The rabbits were sacrificed 2 weeks after medication, and the articular cartilage of the knee joint was collected for Micro-CT, histology and Western blot analysis. Obvious articular cartilage lesion and joint space narrowing were detected in the OA group. Compared with the OA group, less osteoarthritic changes were observed in the MD and HD groups. The MD and HD groups had significantly lower bone volume fraction, trabecular number and Mankin scores than the LD and OA groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found between the OA and LD groups (p > 0.05). The expressions of SIRT1 and p53 detected by western blot were consistent with the aforementioned findings. Therefore, resveratrol can activate the SIRT1 gene to play a protective role in the OA process by inhibiting chondrocyte apoptosis, trabecular bone number increasing of the subchondral bone, as well as elevation of bone density. It demonstrated the importance of SIRT1 in maintaining articular cartilage health and provided a promising therapeutic intervention in the treatment of OA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.