Summary Whole‐genome annotation error that omits essential protein‐coding genes hinders further research. We developed Target Gene Family Finder ( tgfam‐finder ), an alternative tool for the structural annotation of protein‐coding genes containing target domain(s) of interest in plant genomes. tgfam‐finder took considerably reduced annotation run‐time and improved accuracy compared to conventional annotation tools. Large‐scale re‐annotation of 50 plant genomes identified an average of 150, 166 and 86 additional far‐red‐impaired response 1, nucleotide‐binding and leucine‐rich‐repeat, and cytochrome P450 genes, respectively, that were missed in previous annotations. We detected significantly higher number of translated genes in the new annotations using mass spectrometry data from seven plant species compared to previous annotations. tgfam‐finder along with the new gene models can provide an optimized platform for comprehensive functional, comparative, and evolutionary studies in plants.

No abstract

This study was conducted to determine the use of screening for stomach, liver, colorectal, breast, and cervical cancers, which are included in the Korean National Cancer Screening Programme. In 2011 the National Cancer Centre in Korea conducted a nationwide, population-based, cross-sectional interview survey using multi-stage random sampling. Participants included 4,100 cancer-free men 40 years and over of age and women over 30 years of age. The lifetime screening rates for stomach, liver, colorectal, breast, and cervical cancers were 76.2%, 54.3%, 56.1%, 79.0%, and, 74.8%, respectively. The rates of recommended screening for stomach, liver, colorectal, breast, and cervical cancers were 64.6%, 22.9%, 35.3%, 60.4%, and 62.4%, respectively. More than 70% of all screening was attributed to organised cancer screening programmes. The main reason given for non attendance was 'no symptoms'. A greater effort is needed to increase screening rates, especially for liver and colorectal cancers.

Background Pressure injury (PI) is a significant health problem among inpatients that affects their health, quality of life, and expenses. Aim This systematic review aimed to compare effects of alternating pressure air mattresses (APMs) with other types of supporting surfaces as a tool for PI prevention. Methods The literature published between 2009 and 2020 was searched using the databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses process was followed, including independent study selection and data extraction. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0). Results A total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were analyzed. The incidence of hospital‐acquired PIs at stage 1 or higher was reported in the APM group from 0.3% to 25%. In one study, APMs were found to be less effective than static air mattresses (SAMs); in contrast, two studies found no difference. In one study, the APM was reported to be more effective than the viscoelastic foam mattress (VFM). On the contrary, in a more recent study, the APM was reported to be less effective than the VFM, and there was no difference compared with high‐specification foam mattresses in another study. Using the RoB 2.0 tool, one study was evaluated at “low risk of bias,” another as “some concern,” and four as “high risk.” Linking Evidence to Action There is insufficient evidence to suggest that APM is more effective in preventing PIs than other supporting surfaces. Evidence to date suggests that APM can be used in patients at risk for PIs. It is important to change position regardless of the type of support surface used. Highly controlled RCTs with low risk of bias are needed to provide strong evidence for identifying the most effective PI prevention support surfaces.

For many conferences and events, increased attendee registration leads to increased profits for the hosting organization. Food functions, in particular, can be an effective tool to satisfy attendees and build attendance, as it empowers an attendee's sensory memory of an event. Nutritiously balanced food can enhance an attendee's learning ability. The purpose of this research was to identify factors that impact the attendee's satisfaction with conference food functions, and further, to understand an attendee's return intention based on the satisfaction level at a corporate conference. It is concluded that the quality of food content is the leading determinant of an attendee's satisfaction with the food function performance and that food function predicts an attendee's intention to return. This research provides insights into how important food functions are to conference attendees' intent to return to future conferences.