No abstract

No abstract

SUMMARYSleep bruxism is a sleep-related movement disorder that can be responsible for various pains and dysfunctions in the orofacial region. The aim of the current case-control association study was to investigate the association of genetic, psychological and behavioral factors with sleep bruxism in a Japanese population. Non-related participants were recruited and divided into either a sleep bruxism group (n = 66) or control group (n = 48) by clinical diagnoses and 3-night masseter electromyographic recordings by means of a portable miniature device. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Temperament and Character Inventory, NEO-Five Factor Inventory and custom-made questionnaires that asked about familial aggregation, alcohol intake, caffeine intake, cigarette smoking, past stressful life events, daytime tooth-contacting habit, temporomandibular disorder, daily headache, snoring, apnea ⁄ hypopnea symptoms, leg-restlessness symptoms and nocturnal-myoclonus symptoms were administered. In addition, 13 polymorphisms in four genes related to serotonergic neurotransmission (SLC6A4, HTR1A, HTR2A and HTR2C) were genotyped. These factors were compared between case (sleep bruxism) and control groups in order to select potential predictors of sleep-bruxism status. The statistical procedure selected five predictors: Epworth Sleepiness Scale, leg-restlessness symptoms, rs6313 genotypes, rs2770304 genotypes and rs4941573 genotypes. A multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis between the selected predictors and sleep-bruxism status was then conducted. This analysis revealed that only the C allele carrier of HTR2A single nucleotide polymorphism rs6313 (102C>T) was associated significantly with an increased risk of sleep bruxism (odds ratio = 4.250, 95% confidence interval: 1.599-11.297, P = 0.004).This finding suggests a possible genetic contribution to the etiology of sleep bruxism. INTRODUC TIONSleep bruxism (SB) is characterized by involuntary masticatory muscle activities during sleep and is classified as

No abstract

BackgroundOne of the most immediate and important functional consequences of many oral disorders is a reduction in chewing ability. The ability to chew is not only an important dimension of oral health, but is increasingly recognized as being associated with general health status. Whether perceived chewing ability and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) are correlated to a similar degree in patient populations has been less investigated. The aim of this study was to examine whether perceived chewing ability was related to OHRQoL in partially dentate patients.MethodsConsecutive partially dentate patients (N = 489) without signs or symptoms of acute oral disease at Tokyo Medical and Dental University's Prosthodontic Clinic participated in the study (mean age 63.0 ± 11.5, 71.2% female). A 20-item chewing function questionnaire (score range 0 to 20) was used to assess perceived chewing ability, with higher scores indicating better chewing ability. The 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile-Japanese version (OHIP-J14, score range 0 to 56) was used to measure OHRQoL, with higher scores indicating poorer OHRQoL. A Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the correlation between the two questionnaire summary scores. A linear regression analysis was used to describe how perceived chewing ability scores were related to OHRQoL scores.ResultsThe mean chewing function score was 12.1 ± 4.8 units. The mean OHIP-J14 summary score was 13.0 ± 9.1 units. Perceived chewing ability and OHRQoL were significantly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient: -0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.52 to -0.38), indicating that higher chewing ability was correlated with lower OHIP-J14 summary scores (p < 0.001), which indicate better OHRQoL. A 1.0-unit increase in chewing function scores was related to a decrease of 0.87 OHIP-J14 units (95% CI: -1.0 to -0.72, p < 0.001). The correlation between perceived chewing ability and OHRQoL was not substantially influenced by age and number of teeth, but by gender, years of schooling, treatment demand and denture status.ConclusionPatients' perception of their chewing ability was substantially related to their OHRQoL.