Background: Non-age-related gait kinematics and kinetics are essential indicators for gait with normal function. They are instrumental in clinical evaluation and assistant device design. However, only a few studies focus on non-age-related gait analysis. This study aims to identify the non-age-related gait kinematics and kinetics by comparing their normalized time-varying waveforms in the healthy elderly and young groups. Methods: Gait analysis for each gait cycle at self-paced is conducted from marker trajectories and ground reaction force. Pattern distance and percentage of significant difference between the young and elderly are calculated to represent the two sets of waveforms. The k-means clustering and elbow method are used to select and validate non-age-related kinematics and kinetics. The average waveforms with standard deviation are plotted for the comparison of the results. Results: There is no significant difference in weight and height between two aging groups. The elbow point is where the k value equals two. The cluster centers of the two groups are 0.1417 and 0.3691 while total Euclidean distances are 0.001794 and 0.02750, respectively. The two critical values closest to the cutoff are 0.1593 and 0.3037. The average waveforms of the non-age-related group are highly overlapped with a minor standard deviation between healthy young and elderly groups but show lager variations between healthy and abnormal groups. Conclusions: Ankle moment, knee angle, hip flexion angle, and hip adduction moment are identified as the non-age-related gait kinematic or kinetic features with distinguishing cutoff. These features are validated to reflect abnormal walking function, which is essential in the evaluation of mobility and functional ability of the elderly, and data fusion of the assistant device.
Background The change of gait kinematics and kinetics along aging were reported to indicate age-related gait patterns. However, few studies focus on non-age-related gait analysis. This study aims to explore the non-age-related gait kinematics and kinetics by comparing gait analysis outcomes among the healthy elderly and young subjects. Methods Gait analysis at self-paced was conducted on 12 healthy young subjects and 8 healthy elderly subjects. Kinematic and kinetic features of ankle, knee and hip joints were analyzed and compared in two groups. The degree of variation between the young and elderly in each kinematic or kinetic feature was calculated from pattern distance and percentage of significant difference. The k-means clustering and Elbow Method were applied to select and validate non-age-related features. The average waveforms with standard deviation were plotted for the comparison of the results. Results A total of five kinematic and five kinetic features were analyzed on ankle, knee and hip joints in healthy young and elderly groups. The degrees of variation in ankle moment, knee angle, hip flexion angle, and hip adduction moment were 0.1074, 0.1593, 0.1407, and 0.1593, respectively. The turning point was where the k value equals two. The clustering centers were 0.1417 and 0.3691, and the two critical values closest to the cutoff were 0.1593 and 0.3037. The average waveforms of the kinematic or kinetic features mentioned above were highly overlapped with a minor standard deviation between the healthy young and elderly but showed larger variations between the healthy and abnormal. Conclusions The cluster with a minor degree of variation in kinematic and kinetic features between the young and elderly were identified as non-age-related, including ankle moment, knee angle, hip flexion angle, and hip adduction moment. Non-age-related gait kinematics and kinetics are essential indicators for gait with normal function, which is essential in the evaluation of mobility and functional ability of the elderly, and data fusion of the assistant device.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.