Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death in Europe. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the efficiency of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and the mean platelet volume (MPV) as tools for the preoperative diagnosis of CRC and their usefulness in the follow-up of CRC. A total of 144 CRC patients, as diagnosed by colonoscopy, and 143 age-matched and sex-matched healthy participants were included in the study. Medical records were used to compare preoperative and postoperative data including hemoglobin levels, platelet counts, MPV, NLR, and PLR. NLR, PLR, and MPV were significantly higher in CRC patients preoperatively, compared with healthy participants. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis suggested 2.02 as the cutoff value for NLR [area under the curve (AUC): 0.921, sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 84%], 135 as the cutoff value for PLR, (AUC: 0.853, sensitivity: 70%, specificity: 90%) and 8.25 fl as the cutoff value for MPV (AUC: 0.717, sensitivity: 54%, specificity: 76%). Subgroup analysis showed that NLR, PLR, and MPV levels were also significantly higher in nonanemic CRC patients compared with the control group, which is of great theoretical and clinical value for the early detection of CRC. Surgical tumor resection resulted in a significant decrease in NLR, PLR, and MPV. Our results suggest that NLR, PLR, and MPV may be used as easily available additional biomarkers for CRC in screening the general population, as well as in postoperative follow-up.

Background Crohn’s disease (CD) is characterised by chronic gastrointestinal inflammation with relapsing–remitting behaviour and often requires endoscopic and/or radiologic assessment. Objective The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) for the assessment of disease activity in CD using a simple endoscopic score for CD as a reference standard. Patients and methods A prospective observational study was carried out in 71 consecutive adult patients with known CD, attending our tertiary inflammatory bowel disease clinic, between November 2014 and July 2016. Ileocolonoscopy, IUS and MRE were performed within 1 month prospectively. The simple endoscopic score-CD 0–2 was accepted as remission. Results The sensitivity of IUS and MRE for detecting endoscopic activity was found similar with regard to bowel wall thickening and mesenteric fibrofatty proliferation (P>0.05). The overall accuracy for detecting mural lesions was similar between IUS and MRE. When mural lesions were analysed, the sensitivity of MRE in detecting the loss of wall stratification and stenosis was significantly higher than IUS (P<0.001 for both). IUS showed higher specificity for bowel wall thickening, loss of wall stratification and stenosis (P=0.009, P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Sensitivity and accuracy of IUS were higher in detecting ascites in active disease (P=0.002). Discussion Our results showed that IUS and MRE were equally accurate in detecting endoscopic activity. IUS may be the preferred technique for the evaluation of disease activity and for the follow-up of CD.

Atrial electromechanical conduction is prolonged in IBD, and exposure to chronic inflammation may lead to structural and electrophysiological changes in the atrial tissue that causes slow conduction. Measurement of atrial EMD parameters might be used to predict the risk for the development of AF in patients with IBD.

No abstract

Background and Aim The aim of this study was to compare the quality and tolerability of bowel preparation using split high‐doses of sennosides versus split‐dose polyethylene glycol (PEG). Methods In this prospective, randomized, and endoscopist‐blinded study, 474 outpatients were included and randomly assigned to two groups: Group 1 was comprised of 237 patients receiving split high‐dose (1000 mg) sennoside solutions, and group 2 included 237 patients receiving 4 L of PEG. The efficacy of the preparations was evaluated on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), and compliance and adverse effects were recorded. Results The quality of colon cleansing and the ease of bowel preparation were significantly better in the senna group; the mean of total BBPS scores was 7.35 in the senna group and 6.57 in the PEG group, cleansing was adequate (BBPS score ≥ 6) in 89.9% of patients taking senna, and 73.8% in the PEG group (P = 0.001). The rates of vomiting in the senna and PEG groups were 12.7% and 29.5%, nausea rates were 28.7% and 43.9%, and abdominal pain rates were 70.9% and 43%, respectively (P < 0.001). Cecal intubation rates in the senna and PEG groups were 95.4% and 86.1% (P = 0.001), and the cecal intubation times were 6.73 ± 2.84 and 5.34 ± 5.98 min, respectively (P = 0.001). Conclusions Split high‐dose senna is more effective than split‐dose PEG in terms of bowel preparation quality and patient compliance. The patients who received senna had significantly less vomiting and nausea but significantly more abdominal pain. Thus, senna may be used as an alternative to PEG for bowel preparation.