Retinoblastoma (Rb) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy of childhood, but an uncommon paediatric cancer, with a constant incidence worldwide of 1:15,000-1:20,000 live births. Despite its rarity, Rb has served as a cornerstone in the field of oncology in many of the aspects that comprise cancer management, including classification schemes, treatment modalities, genetic testing and screening. Until just over half a century ago, the major treatment for Rb was eye removal, and prognosis was poor with outcome fatal for most children. The dramatic evolution, in a short period of time across all fields of Rb management, as well as the development of specialized centres, better infrastructure and introduction of awareness campaigns, has resulted in nearly 100% survival in developed countries and allowed eye salvage in many of the cases. External beam radiotherapy was used as the main treatment choice for four decades, but replaced by chemotherapy at the turn of the century. Initially, and still in many centres, chemotherapy is administered intravenously, but recently is targeted directly into the eye by means of intra-ophthalmic artery and intravitreal chemotherapy. To date, a range of treatments is available to the Rb expert, including enucleation, but there is lack of consensus in a number of scenarios as to what to use and when. In such a rare cancer, treatment outcomes are reported usually via retrospective analyses, with few prospective randomized controlled trials. Classification schemes have also evolved following the introduction of new treatment modalities, but discrepancies exist among centres with respect to the preferred schema and its interpretation. Retinoblastoma management is a remarkable success story, but the future will require a collaborative effort in the form of multicentre randomized controlled trials in order to further improve the quality of care for this subset of young children with ocular cancer.

The retinoblastoma-predisposition gene, RBI, segregates as an autosomal dominant trait with high (90%) penetrance. Certain families, however, show an unusual low-penetrance phenotype with many individuals being unaffected, unilaterally affected, or with evidence of spontaneously regressed tumors. We have used single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and PCR sequencing to study two such families. Mutations were found in exon 20 ofRB) in both cases.

Forty-nine primary retinoblastoma (Rb) tumors were analyzed by the use of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), and clinical/histological correlations were performed. Adverse histological factors were present in 13 patients. Chromosomal imbalance was a frequent phenomenon, seen in 96% of the tumors. Gain of 6p represented the most frequent event (69% of the tumors), whereas +1q was observed in 57%, confirming that these abnormalities are key secondary events in retinoblastoma tumor progression. Loss of 13q and 16 was significantly associated with tumors displaying adverse histo-prognostic factors, whereas -16q was significantly associated with tumors without adverse features. In three patients who developed an extra-ocular relapse, the tumors showed -13q and 2/3 had -5q, suggesting that these abnormalities may be associated with metastasis. Children>or= 36 months of age at enucleation tended to have more CGH abnormalities per tumor than children < 12 months (median numbers 11 vs. 3). In addition, +1q, +13q, -16, and -16q were more frequent in children with an older age at enucleation. Identical CGH changes were found in both tumors from one patient with bilateral tumors, suggesting a common origin. It is possible that tumors displaying loss of 13q and 5q indicate those patients who may suffer an adverse outcome and who would require alternative or more intensive therapy. CGH analysis on larger cohorts and in prospective clinical trials will be invaluable in determining whether a genetic classification of retinoblastoma represents a reliable measure of prognosis.

There were 998 unilateral cases, 581 bilateral and 22 of unknown laterality. Bilateral cases tended to be diagnosed at a younger age than unilateral. All bilateral cases are regarded as heritable, and 35% had a family history of the disease. 7% of the unilateral cases had a family history and are therefore heritable. Thus, at least (41%) of our cases are heritable. This is an underestimate, since these data on family history are incomplete. For unilateral cases aged below 1 year, the reported incidence rate increased significantly (p<0.0001) by about 2.5% per year; for the age group 1-4 years, the average increase was about 0.5% per year (not significant).

The full range of screening techniques is required to achieve a high screening sensitivity in RB patients.