The feasible of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) remains controversial when compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to summarise the available evidence to compare MIPD vs OPD. We systemically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for studies published through February 2016. The primary endpoint was postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF, grade B/C). A total of 27 studies involving 14,231 patients (2,377 MIPD and 11,854 OPD) were included. MIPD was associated with longer operative times (P < 0.01) and increased mortality (P < 0.01), but decreased estimated blood loss (P < 0.01), decreased delayed gastric emptying (P < 0.01), increased R0 resection rate (P < 0.01), decreased wound infection (P = 0.03) and shorter hospital stays (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in BMI (P = 0.43), tumor size (P = 0.17), lymph nodes harvest (P = 0.57), POPF (P = 0.84), reoperation (P = 0.25) and 5-year survival rates (P = 0.82) for MIPD compared with OPD. Although there was an increased operative cost (P < 0.01) for MIPD compared with OPD, the postoperative cost was less (P < 0.01) with the similar total costs (P = 0.28). MIPD can be a reasonable alternative to OPD with the potential advantage of being minimally invasive. However, MIPD should be performed in high-volume centers and more randomized-controlled trials are needed to evaluate the appropriate indications of MIPD.

Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is an important organ supportive technique. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of early classic CVVH on the outcomes of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) patients with early organ failure (EOF). Between 2008 and 2012, a total of 44 SAP patients with EOF were admitted to our department. The 44 patients were classified into two groups according to whether they received early classic CVVH (2 L/h, initiated within 24 h after admission): 25 patients received early CVVH (ECVVH group), and 19 patients did not receive early CVVH (control group). The two groups were matched for age and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores. The severity of organ dysfunctions was evaluated by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. Each group included 19 patients. The baseline characters between the two groups were balanced. The SOFA scores in the ECVVH group increased compared with those in the control group. The time to weaning from mechanical ventilation was significantly longer in the ECVVH group (log-rank test: χ(2)  = 4.007, P = 0.045). Renal support was also significantly prolonged in the ECVVH group (the number of patients receiving CVVH 72 h after admission: 10 vs. 3, respectively, P = 0.038). Nine patients died in the ECVVH group versus six patients in the control group (P = 0.508). In conclusion, our study failed to prove that early classic CVVH had any benefits on the outcomes of SAP patients with EOF. Unexpectedly, early classic CVVH worsened organ functional capacity. However, it is possible that CVVH using advanced techniques may be beneficial in SAP patients with EOF.

Thus, we identified B10 cells as a protective factor for SAP and provided a novel target for SAP treatment.