Due to the mechanistic coupling between solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and photosynthesis, SIF has an advantage over greenness-based vegetation indices in detecting drought. Since photosystem I (PSI) contributes very little to red SIF, red SIF is assumed to be more responsive to environmental stress than far-red SIF. However, in addition to affecting photosynthesis, drought also has an impact on vegetation chlorophyll concentration and thus affects the reabsorption process of red SIF. When these responses are entangled, the sensitivity of SIF in the red and far-red regions in response to drought is not yet clear. In this study, we conducted a water stress experiment on maize in the field and measured the upward and downward leaf SIF spectra by a spectrometer assembled with a leaf clip. Simultaneously, leaf-level active fluorescence was measured with a pulse-amplified modulation (PAM) fluorometer. We found that SIF, after normalization by photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and dark-adapted minimal fluorescence (Fo), is a better estimation of SIF yield. By comparing the wavelength-dependent link between SIF yield and nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) across the range of 660 to 800 nm, the results show that red SIF and far-red SIF have different sensitivities in response to drought. SIF yield in the far-red region has a strong and stable correlation with NPQ. Drought not only reduces red SIF due to photosynthetic regulation, but it also increases red SIF by reducing chlorophyll content (weakening the reabsorption effect). The co-existence of these two contradictory effects makes the red SIF of leaf level unable to reliably indicate NPQ. In addition, the red:far-red ratio of downward SIF and the ratio between the downward SIF and upward SIF at the red peak can be good indicators of chlorophyll content. These findings can help to interpret SIF variations in remote sensing techniques and fully exploit SIF information in red and far-red regions when monitoring plant water stress.

No abstract