2019
DOI: 10.1002/app.47923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1,3‐Diamino‐2‐propanol or 2‐aminoethanethiol modified active layer of thin‐film composite forward osmosis membrane

Abstract: This work proposes three easy and effective methods to improve the density of the active layer of the thin-film composite (TFC) forward osmosis (FO) membrane. Amino groups are introduced to the polyamide layer to react with the exposed acid chloride groups after a small molecule of 1,3-diamino-2-propanol (DH) or 2-aminoethanethiol (AE) or DH-AE being introduced. This may lead to a higher degree of crosslinking and form a more complex and networked aggregate structure. In this work, three modified membranes are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Regarding the operation mechanism, the FO process is adopted as a low-pressure process and demonstrates more practical resistance to fouling than the RO process, which is set to function at a higher hydraulic pressure. [17][18][19] It must be taken into consideration that a low hydraulic pressure is not solely responsible for the reduction of the FO membrane fouling; they also suffer from the fouling process, low water penetration, and high reverse salt penetration. To obtain better antifouling features along with high selectivity and water permeability, it is imperative to engineer and modify the applied membranes diligently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Regarding the operation mechanism, the FO process is adopted as a low-pressure process and demonstrates more practical resistance to fouling than the RO process, which is set to function at a higher hydraulic pressure. [17][18][19] It must be taken into consideration that a low hydraulic pressure is not solely responsible for the reduction of the FO membrane fouling; they also suffer from the fouling process, low water penetration, and high reverse salt penetration. To obtain better antifouling features along with high selectivity and water permeability, it is imperative to engineer and modify the applied membranes diligently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%