Prison Sex 2002
DOI: 10.1515/9781685857738-011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10 Conjugal Visitation Programs: The Logical Conclusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If not activated, it can affect sexual behavior (Maryani, 2019), namely having sexual fantasies or nocturnal sex dreams, doing self-masturbation, and having a same-sex relationship (homosexuality) (S. P. Srivastava, 1958). These three sexual behaviours are common in prison because of the high sexual need (Chirstophe Hensley, 2002). Meanwhile, in order to satisfy his sexual needs, the detainee can initiate DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v0i0.9327 various methods, including resorting to the period of sexual intercourse or probation (Okky Chahyo Nugroho, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If not activated, it can affect sexual behavior (Maryani, 2019), namely having sexual fantasies or nocturnal sex dreams, doing self-masturbation, and having a same-sex relationship (homosexuality) (S. P. Srivastava, 1958). These three sexual behaviours are common in prison because of the high sexual need (Chirstophe Hensley, 2002). Meanwhile, in order to satisfy his sexual needs, the detainee can initiate DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v0i0.9327 various methods, including resorting to the period of sexual intercourse or probation (Okky Chahyo Nugroho, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%