PsycTESTS Dataset 2002
DOI: 10.1037/t39142-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10-item Depression in the Medically Ill Screening Measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The factor analyses results confirmed the unidimensional structure that the original authors seemed to have hypothesized for both the questionnaires (DMI-18 and DMI-10), showing a good fit (Parker et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The factor analyses results confirmed the unidimensional structure that the original authors seemed to have hypothesized for both the questionnaires (DMI-18 and DMI-10), showing a good fit (Parker et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In the original DMI study, Parker et al (2002) recommended using a cutoff point of 20 for the DMI-18 and 9 for the DMI-10. In our study, the best cutoff point for detecting depression was 15 for the DMI-18 and 9 for the DMI-10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations