2019
DOI: 10.1130/g45604c.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10Be in Australasian microtektites compared to tektites: Size and geographic controls: COMMENT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his welcome commentary on our paper (Rochette et al 2018), Mizera (2019) challenges our preferred interpretation for the Australasian tektite (AAT) source: soil-covered old continental sediments, i.e., 10 Be-rich onto 10 Be-poor material. Blum et al's (1992) analysis of Sr and Nd isotopic ratios points toward Jurassic-Cretaceous sediments, such as those found in abundance in south Laos and east Thailand (Singsoupho et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In his welcome commentary on our paper (Rochette et al 2018), Mizera (2019) challenges our preferred interpretation for the Australasian tektite (AAT) source: soil-covered old continental sediments, i.e., 10 Be-rich onto 10 Be-poor material. Blum et al's (1992) analysis of Sr and Nd isotopic ratios points toward Jurassic-Cretaceous sediments, such as those found in abundance in south Laos and east Thailand (Singsoupho et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%