11.2: <i>Distinguished Paper</i>: VCMaster3D: A New Fourier Optics Viewing Angle Instrument for Characterization of Autostereoscopic 3D Displays.

Leroux, Thierry; Boher, Pierre; Bignon, Thibault; Glinel, David; Uehara, Shigeo

doi:10.1889/1.3256493

Cited by 16 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The square maintains the dimension of the quantity as a contrast which can be compared to the standard contrast of displays. These calculations are very similar to those applied to auto-stereoscopic 3D displays but each contrast is obtained separately using the two GL and GR filters [1][2][3]. When different locations are analyzed simultaneously, the different contrasts for each eye are calculated using previous equations, and the minimum value of these contrasts for the different locations is taken using: …”

Section: Observementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The situation is similar for the auto-stereoscopic 3D displays. Recently we have proposed a new characterization method for auto-stereoscopic 3D displays based on ultrahigh angular resolution Fourier optics measurement and computation in the observer space [1][2][3]. This method is particularly efficient and provides quantitative parameters for easy comparison of auto-stereoscopic 3D displays by computing Qualified Monocular Viewing Space (QMVS) and Qualified Binocular Viewing Space (QBVS), 3D contrast, standard contrast and color shifts.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Multispectral polarization viewing angle analysis of circular polarized stereoscopic 3D displays

et al. 2010

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we propose a method to characterize polarization based stereoscopic 3D displays using multispectral Fourier optics viewing angle measurements. Full polarization analysis of the light emitted by the display in the full viewing cone is made at 31 wavelengths in the visible range. Vertical modulation of the polarization state is observed and explained by the position of the phase shift filter into the display structure. In addition, strong spectral dependence of the ellipticity and polarization degree is observed. These features come from the strong spectral dependence of the phase shift film and introduce some imperfections (color shifts and reduced contrast). Using the measured transmission properties of the two glasses filters, the resulting luminance across each filter is computed for left and right eye views. Monocular contrast for each eye and binocular contrasts are performed in the observer space, and Qualified Monocular and Binocular Viewing Spaces (QMVS and QBVS) can be deduced in the same way as auto-stereoscopic 3D displays allowing direct comparison of the performances.

show abstract

Section: Observementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multispectral polarization viewing angle analysis of circular polarized stereoscopic 3D displays

et al. 2010

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[1][2][3] For wide usage of 3-D technologies, the performance characterization and human factors of 3-D technologies are also important. [4][5][6] For example, 3-D cross-talk has been used as one indicator of 3-D performance, and it had been reported that 3-D cross-talk of 10-15% can cause degradation of the image quality. 4 3-D technology using polarized eyeglasses provides a wider range of movement freedom compared with that for an autostereoscopic 3-D display.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of angular dependence of 3‐D technology using polarized eyeglasses

Hong¹,

Jang²,

Lee³

et al. 2010

J Soc Info Display

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract— The cause of the angular dependence of 3‐D technology that requires the use of eyeglasses with linear or circular polarization is analyzed. For 3‐D technology that requires the use of eyeglasses, anisotropic media such as a polarizer or retardation film determines the polarization state. Therefore, the angular behavior of 3‐D display performance is also affected by the characteristics of the anisotropic media that have intrinsic angular dependence. Various conditions of the optic axes of the imaging display and eyeglasses are investigated to understand their effect on 3‐D display performance. The result shows that some conditions of the optic axes can cause non‐negligible degradation of 3‐D display performance.

show abstract

“…6 Recently, we have proposed a characterization method for autostereoscopic 3-D displays which is based on ultrahigh-angular-resolution Fourier-optics viewing-angle measurements and computation in the observer space. [7][8][9] This method is particularly efficient and provides quantitative parameters for easy comparison of autostereoscopic 3-D displays in terms of qualified monocular viewing space (QMVS), qualified binocular viewing space (QBVS), 3-D contrast, standard contrast, and color shifts. The purpose of this paper is to show that the same type of characterization is also possible for polarization-based stereoscopic 3-D displays using a Fourier-optics viewing-angle instrument and dedicated polarization filters.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A common approach to characterizing autostereoscopic and polarization‐based 3‐D displays

Boher¹,

Leroux²,

Patton³

et al. 2010

J Soc Info Display

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract— Autostereoscopic and polarization‐based stereoscopic 3‐D displays recreate 3‐D images by providing different images in the two eyes of an observer. This aim is achieved differently for these two families of 3‐D displays. It is shown that viewing‐angle measurements can be applied to characterize both types of displays. Viewing‐angle luminance measurements are made at different locations on the display surface for each view emitted by the display. For autostereoscopic displays, a Fourier‐optics instrument with an ultra‐high‐angular‐resolution VCMaster3D is used. For polarization‐based displays, a standard Fourier‐optics instrument with additional glass filters is used. Then, what will be seen by an observer in front of the display is computed. Monocular and binocular quality criteria (left‐ and right‐eye contrast, 3‐D contrast) was used to quantify the ability to perceive depth for any observer position. Qualified monocular and binocular viewing spaces (QMVS and QBVS) are deduced. Precise 3‐D characteristics are derived such as maximum 3‐D contrast, optical viewing freedom in each direction, color shifts, and standard contrast. A quantitative comparison between displays of all types becomes possible.

show abstract

11.2: Distinguished Paper: VCMaster3D: A New Fourier Optics Viewing Angle Instrument for Characterization of Autostereoscopic 3D Displays.

Cited by 16 publications

References 6 publications

Multispectral polarization viewing angle analysis of circular polarized stereoscopic 3D displays

Multispectral polarization viewing angle analysis of circular polarized stereoscopic 3D displays

Analysis of angular dependence of 3‐D technology using polarized eyeglasses

A common approach to characterizing autostereoscopic and polarization‐based 3‐D displays

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About