2005
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/17137072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

16 detector multislice CT versus skeletal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of wrist fractures: value of quantification of99Tcm-MDP uptake

Abstract: To compare the measured uptake of 99Tcm-methylene diphosphonate (99Tcm-MDP) in those scaphoid fractures seen on both 16 detector multislice CT and scintigraphy, with those seen only on scintigraphy. Over a 12 month period a total of 51 patients with suspected fracture underwent both conventional 99Tcm-MDP scintigraphy and 16 detector multislice CT on the same day. The 99Tcm-MDP uptake was then quantified in patients with identified fracture. This was measured by placing a region of interest (ROI) over the frac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been recognized increased 99m Tc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) uptake is sensitive to metabolic change; however, it is not specific regarding the underlying causes, such as fracture, bone bruise, soft tissue injury, and inflammation at adjacent joints [23]. Our analysis also showed the heterogeneity in specificity for bone scintigraphy among studies was substantial and the period between injury and the test was associated with the variation: longer period was associated with higher specificity and reduced heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It has been recognized increased 99m Tc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) uptake is sensitive to metabolic change; however, it is not specific regarding the underlying causes, such as fracture, bone bruise, soft tissue injury, and inflammation at adjacent joints [23]. Our analysis also showed the heterogeneity in specificity for bone scintigraphy among studies was substantial and the period between injury and the test was associated with the variation: longer period was associated with higher specificity and reduced heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The prevalence of true fracture among suspected scaphoid fracture was derived from studies that prospectively or consecutively recruited at least 50 patients with suspected scaphoid fractures and confirmed scaphoid fracture with MRI or radiographs with follow-up of at least 6 weeks. 4,6,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] The weighted mean (the numbers of patients with a clinical condition reported in different studies were summed and then divided by the sum of the total number of patients in each study) was used as the baseline value, and the range obtained from these studies was used for the sensitivity analysis. One prospective study provided the probability of positive clinical signs of patients with suspected scaphoid fracture at 2 weeks after injury.…”
Section: Strategy 6 (Day 3 Mri) and Strategy 7 (Day 3 Bone Scan)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skeletal scintigraphy has also been compared with CTand MRI. 8 The exact role of scintigraphy is yet to be defined because in the injured wrist scaphoids sometimes will show uptake in the absence of CT or MRI changes. CT however has been used in planning the type of surgery in established scaphoid fractures as also to develop a classification system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%