2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000163098.01398.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Thyroid from Positron Emission Tomogram (PET) for Evaluation in Cancer Patients: High Prevalence of Malignancy in Thyroid PET Incidentaloma

Abstract: Our data suggest that a cytologic diagnosis of focal thyroid FDG-PET incidentaloma regardless of SUV is mandatory considering the very high prevalence of thyroid malignancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

36
178
6
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
36
178
6
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] In contrast, diffuse, bilateral FDG-PET uptake is usually associated with benign disease (Table 3) In the current study, the prevalence of cancer was 30% (9/30) for those in whom a confirmed cytologic or histologic diagnosis was obtained via FNAC or surgery, and this incidence was similar to that reported by others. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The overall incidence of cancer in the current series was relatively low at 8.7% (9 of 103). Because more than half of the patients with PETomas (53 of 103) did not undergo further evaluation with either ultrasonography, FNAC or surgery, the true prevalence of cancer is arguably underestimated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] In contrast, diffuse, bilateral FDG-PET uptake is usually associated with benign disease (Table 3) In the current study, the prevalence of cancer was 30% (9/30) for those in whom a confirmed cytologic or histologic diagnosis was obtained via FNAC or surgery, and this incidence was similar to that reported by others. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The overall incidence of cancer in the current series was relatively low at 8.7% (9 of 103). Because more than half of the patients with PETomas (53 of 103) did not undergo further evaluation with either ultrasonography, FNAC or surgery, the true prevalence of cancer is arguably underestimated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Moreover, the prevalence of malignancy within these PETomas is remarkably high at 14%-56%. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] In contrast, diffuse, bilateral FDG-PET uptake is usually associated with benign disease (Table 3) In the current study, the prevalence of cancer was 30% (9/30) for those in whom a confirmed cytologic or histologic diagnosis was obtained via FNAC or surgery, and this incidence was similar to that reported by others. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The overall incidence of cancer in the current series was relatively low at 8.7% (9 of 103).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations