2. Greeks and indigenous population at Berezan (Borysthenes)

Solovyov, Sergey

doi:10.4000/books.pccj.491

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This involves, in particular, the remarkable quantity of ostraca, but also early lead letters and graffiti mentioning slaves that date back to the sixth century BCE (Avram 2007;Fischer 2016;Odrin 2019). Moreover, it is possible that the sizable amount of handmade indigenous Scythian pottery, as well as Thracian and Anatolian pottery found in early contexts in Berezan (Dupont 2018;Solovyov 2020aSolovyov , 2020b, may be the footprint of enslaved women, analogous to the presence of African-style pottery excavated in antebellum North American plantations (Ferguson 1992;Fennell 2011). Like this African American pottery, the handmade "indigenous" pottery from Berezan is likely to have been produced and used by enslaved women in order to maintain their foodways and preserve their domestic dignity.…”

Section: Slaving Raiding Diplomatic Gifts the Hoard's Historical Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

Violent Raiding, Systematic Slaving, and Sweeping Depopulation? Re-Evaluating the Scythian Impact on Central Europe through the Lens of the Witaszkowo/Vettersfelde Hoard

Nebelsick

2024

Arts

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 1882, the lavishly decorated golden regalia of a steppe nomad warrior prince, which was crafted in the late sixth century BCE in a “bilingual” Scythian–Milesian workshop on the Black Sea coast, was found on the edge of a Lusatian swamp 120 km southeast of Berlin. Its discovery and the ongoing findings of steppe nomad armaments—arrows, battle axes, and swords—in central Europe have led to a lively debate about the nature of Scythian–Indigenous interaction in the Early Iron Age, ranging from benign visions of long-term acculturation to violent scenarios of short-term raiding. In this article, I argue that an analysis of the iconography of the Witaszkowo hoard and new information from excavations at its find spot make it likely that it was sent as a diplomatic gift by Scythian elites to an indigenous leader and deposited by the local community as a votive hoard. An affirmation of the compact chronological range of Scythian artefacts found in the west, growing evidence for the destruction of indigenous strongholds by horse-borne archers, and concurrent evidence for the drastic depopulation of vast landscapes in the second half of the sixth century BCE allow us to envisage the gifting of this hoard as an episode of a fierce and destructive altercation. It is posited that this onslaught was a facet of the western thrust of the Lydian and Persian Empires, and that its extirpative impact was the result of systematic, commercially driven slaving triggered by the concurrent monetisation of the economies of the Black Sea coast. The effects of these raids on Eastern Central Europe’s later prehistoric communities are made manifest by analogies to the disastrous ramifications of the transatlantic slave trade on societies of 16th-to-18th-century West Africa.

show abstract