2007
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.107.132142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2-Methoxymethyl-Salvinorin B Is a Potent κ Opioid Receptor Agonist with Longer Lasting Action in Vivo Than Salvinorin A

Abstract: Salvinorin (Sal) A is a naturally occurring, selective opioid receptor (KOPR) agonist with a short duration of action in vivo. Pharmacological properties of a C(2) derivative, 2-methoxymethyl (MOM)-Sal B, were characterized. MOM-Sal B bound to KOPR with high selectivity and displayed ϳ3-fold higher affinity than U50,488H [(trans)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide methanesulfonate] and Sal A. It acted as a full agonist at KOPR in guanosine 5Ј-O-(3-[ 35 S]thio)triphosphate b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
94
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
94
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, salvinorin A (10 mg/ kg) elicited neither antinociception nor hypothermia 30 min after administration to rats. The findings reported by Wang et al (2008) suggest that salvinorin B MOM is a potent and efficacious KOP receptor agonist with longer lasting in vivo effects than salvinorin A. The current findings that salvinorin B MOM and salvinorin B EOM produce substitution in rats trained to discriminate U69,593 support previous reports that these agents are KOP agonists and that they are more potent than salvinorin A.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, salvinorin A (10 mg/ kg) elicited neither antinociception nor hypothermia 30 min after administration to rats. The findings reported by Wang et al (2008) suggest that salvinorin B MOM is a potent and efficacious KOP receptor agonist with longer lasting in vivo effects than salvinorin A. The current findings that salvinorin B MOM and salvinorin B EOM produce substitution in rats trained to discriminate U69,593 support previous reports that these agents are KOP agonists and that they are more potent than salvinorin A.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, these analogs show reduced binding affinity and retain the rapidly metabolized acetate which may be responsible for salvinorin A's brief duration of action. The pharmacological properties of salvinorin B MOM were recently characterized by Wang et al (2008). This compound was reported to bind to KOP receptors with high selectivity and it displayed an approximately threefold higher affinity compared to U50,488 and salvinorin A. Salvinorin B MOM also acted as a full agonist at kappa receptors in functional assays, being approximately fivefold to sevenfold more potent than U50,488 and salvinorin A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the antinociceptive effects of salvinorin A are short-lived (McCurdy et al 2006). More recently, MOMSal B, a semi-synthetic derivative of salvinorin A, was found to produce antinociception using the hot plate test in a dose-dependent manner in rats and has longer lasting in vivo effects than salvinorin A (Wang et al 2008). Additional work suggests that protecting salvinorin A derivatives from metabolism will prolong duration of action, but only when administered by routes giving slow absorption (Hooker et al 2009).…”
Section: Development Of Kop Receptor Agonists As Analgesicsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, a subsequent study by McCurdy et al (2006) reported that salvinorin A administered intraperitoneally to mice produced transient and relatively weak antinociception as well as hypothermia. In a subsequent study, Wang et al (2008) reported that the presumably metabolically stabilized salvinorin A analog 2-methoxymethyl-salvinorin B (94) produced antinociception and hypothermia in rats. The discrepant results reported by Wang et al (2005) and McCurdy et al (2006) are most likely explained by differences in route of administration and pharmacokinetics.…”
Section: B Behavioral Evaluation Of Salvinorin Amentioning
confidence: 99%