22@ and the Innovation District in Barcelona and Montreal: A Process of Clustering Development between Urban Regeneration and Economic Competitiveness

Abstract

This paper analyzes the governance strategy of the 22@ District in Barcelona in order to assess the factors that explain its success and could support the economic reconversion of Montreal's future Innovation District (ID), as well as that of other cities. We examine the case of the 22@ District as a former industrial neighbourhood seen as a "model" of urban regeneration and economic revitalization. Our assumption is that the world's major cities are going through a phase based on the reorganization of central urban areas. Our article evaluates the main factors of urban regeneration in the 22@-district of innovation and it identifies elements of best practices in terms of governance which can be constructive for the "Quartier de l'Innovation" in Montreal and similar projects of other cities. The paper highlights the role of decision makers concerning the process of governance of 22@ and its historic changes, and insists on the the role of socioeconomic actors and territorial factors that could support the level of integration and implementation of Montreal@ID. Our paper highlights the importance of the integration process based on socioterritorial innovations characterizing the Catalan context of 22@ as well as the Innovation District, something useful for other similar initiatives.

Knowledge sharing and development of creative fashion designers' careers: the role of intermediary organisations

“…Indeed, as careers have changed and become more contingent and boundaryless (Jones, 1996) in many sectors today, but particularly in the creative careers, the creative fashion careers can be considered as precursors of other changes in the labour market (Menger, 2002) and as has been proposed, seeing artistic careers as announcing wider changes in careers and the more general labour market scene Menger (2002Menger ( , 2001. Intermediary organisations could thus be useful in other creative sectors and in other sectors as well to support careers and economic development (Battaglia and Tremblay, 2011;Darchen and Tremblay, 2010;Dossou-Yovo and Tremblay, 2012). Our research has contributed to the knowledge in both these fields, that is on creative careers and intermediary organisations, as well as the links between the two fields.…”

Co-production for innovation: the urban living lab experience

“…First, they are based on an organisational approach inspired by the 'quadruple helix' , i.e. collaboration among public authorities, firms, research organisations and people (Battaglia & Tremblay, 2011). ULLs are also labelled as PPPP, or public-private-people partnership (Molinari, 2011).…”

Informing urban governance? Boundary‐spanning organisations and the ecosystem of urban data

“…The geographic proximity component is included in the definition to gain certain benefits, such as shared infrastructure, reduced transportation and transaction costs. Even though Battaglia and Tremblay (, p. 2) argue that innovation districts are “new models” of clustering and “technopolitan” approach, the geographic element is not new or unique to innovation districts (Clark et al., ; Cosgrave et al., ; Porter, ) . These connected clusters aim to facilitate creation and commercialisation of new ideas, and often focus on re‐urbanisation projects.…”