2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2009.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

25-Hydroxyvitamin D Measurement, 2009: A Review for Clinicians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
32
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Other limitations of this study include imprecision in the quantification of 25OHD, and the measurement of 25OHD based on one blood sample that was collected at a single time point, similar to the approach of past studies 8,9) . A few studies have demonstrated that the radioimmunoassay for 25OHD is more reliable than competitive protein-binding assays 18,19) , which is an important consideration as assay variation and standardization of 25OHD measurements are an important issue in this field of research [19][20][21][22] . Nondifferential measurement error and subsequent misclassification would lead to a null association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other limitations of this study include imprecision in the quantification of 25OHD, and the measurement of 25OHD based on one blood sample that was collected at a single time point, similar to the approach of past studies 8,9) . A few studies have demonstrated that the radioimmunoassay for 25OHD is more reliable than competitive protein-binding assays 18,19) , which is an important consideration as assay variation and standardization of 25OHD measurements are an important issue in this field of research [19][20][21][22] . Nondifferential measurement error and subsequent misclassification would lead to a null association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nondifferential measurement error and subsequent misclassification would lead to a null association. Although the measurement of 25OHD using high performance liquid chromatography isotope-dilution tandem mass spectrometry is considered to be the most reliable approach 21) , the high cost of this equipment and the reagents limit their use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, all analyses of 25OHD were conducted on the same day to exclude confounding caused by between-day assay variation 35,36) . A few studies have demonstrated that the radioimmunoassay for 25OHD is more reliable than competitive protein-binding assays 26,37) , which is an important consideration as assay variation and standardization of 25OHD measurements are an important issue in this field of research 31,35,37,38) . In addition to the possibility of clinical misinterpretation [39][40][41] , nondifferential measurement error and subsequent misclassification would lead to underestimation of relative risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative measurement of such error and intraindividual inter-day variation would therefore be useful for estimating the true effects of risk factors such as 25OHD 42) . Although the measurement of 25OHD using high performance liquid chromatography isotope-dilution tandem mass spectrometry is considered to be the most reliable approach 38) , the high cost of this equipment and the reagents limit their use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum 25(OH)D level has been considered as the most reliable indicator of vitamin D status [3]; it reflects the state of repletion or deficiency of vitamin D in the body [3]- [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%