Computational Earthquake Science Part I 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7873-9_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-D Modelling of Plate Interfaces and Numerical Simulation of Long-term Crustal Deformation in and around Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the present study as well as Hashimoto et al (2012) used the plate interface model by Hashimoto et al (2004), while Yamagiwa et al (2015) as well as Ozawa et al (2011Ozawa et al ( , 2012 and Iinuma et al (2012) used the plate interface model by Nakajima and Hasegawa (2006). The model by Hashimoto et al (2004) is very close to the reference geometry, but significantly different in dip-angle at the depths from the model by Nakajima and Hasegawa (2006). In the case of Yamagiwa et al (2015) with the NakajimaHasegawa plate interface model, the updip extension of the dominant afterslip fault intersects the earth's surface at a point about 50-km east off MYGI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the present study as well as Hashimoto et al (2012) used the plate interface model by Hashimoto et al (2004), while Yamagiwa et al (2015) as well as Ozawa et al (2011Ozawa et al ( , 2012 and Iinuma et al (2012) used the plate interface model by Nakajima and Hasegawa (2006). The model by Hashimoto et al (2004) is very close to the reference geometry, but significantly different in dip-angle at the depths from the model by Nakajima and Hasegawa (2006). In the case of Yamagiwa et al (2015) with the NakajimaHasegawa plate interface model, the updip extension of the dominant afterslip fault intersects the earth's surface at a point about 50-km east off MYGI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another cause may be in the difference of the plate interface geometries used for inversion analysis. We plot the vertical sections of the NAM-PAC plate interface off Miyagi (Hashimoto et al 2004;Miura et al 2005;Nakajima and Hasegawa 2006;Hayes et al 2012) used for estimating the coseismic slip and afterslip distributions of the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake in Fig. 9, where the blue line gives a reference geometry, which was deduced from a wide-angle reflection and refraction study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bangs et al, 2004;Park et al, 2010], hypocenter location studies (e.g. Hashimoto et al, 2004), seismic tomography studies (e.g., Nakajima and Hasegawa, 2007b;Hirose et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2014), receiver function analysis (e.g., Shiomi et al, 2008) and wide-angle seismic surveys (e.g. Kodaira et al, 2000Kodaira et al, , 2002Nakanishi et al, 2002;Takahashi et al, 2002).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%